ArticleEJIFCC2023
Development of Control Material for Exhaled Breath-Alcohol Testing and its Application.
Article in EJIFCC, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breath analyser tests are used worldwide to obtain proof of alcohol intoxication and often used in the conviction of traffic violators. These tests are conducted to quickly and painlessly determine the existing concentration of alcohol in arterial blood by measuring the amount of ethanol in exhaled breath, which can be identified with an electrochemical sensor.At present, the calibration and maintenance of analysers used for these tests are typically performed regularly but lack quality control. Consequently, test results may not be accurate because of calibration deterioration.The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the uncertainty of control materials used in breath-alcohol testing at the Bangkok Metropolitan Police Station. Material and methods: Ethyl alcohol (99.99%; Certified Reference Material grade) diluted at three different concentrations was kept under design conditions. The concentrations were 28, 67, and 134 mg/dL, determined by performing headspace gas chromatography, and the uncertainty was set as ±1.3925, ±2.8736, and ±1.8231 mg/dL (±4.97%, ±4.29%, and ±2.72% for the concentrations, respectively), as per ISO Guide 35:2017. Results: The total error percentages of the developed control materials were 4.97%, 4.29%, and 2.72% for concentrations of 28, 67, and 134 mg/dL, respectively. Each concentration of the materials was tested by using measurements from 70 breath-alcohol analysers belonging to the Bangkok Metropolitan Police Station. Conclusion: These control materials are applicable to quality assurance and standards tests and may help to ensure the accuracy of breath-alcohol testing in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37455841PMC10349310W4384493295What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.