Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37455718›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2023

Signaling and crosstalk of rhizobacterial and plant hormones that mediate abiotic stress tolerance in plants.

B N Aloo, J Dessureault-Rompré, V Tripathi, B O Nyongesa, B A Were

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
18.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Growth-Promoting and Quality-Enhancing Effects of Insect-DerivedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Plant growth-promoting bacteria enhance tomato tolerance against tomato spotted wilt virus by unveiling optimal auxin levels.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects ofOpen life sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

B N AlooDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Eldoret, Eldoret, Kenya.
J Dessureault-RompréDepartment of Soil and Agri-Food Engineering, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
V TripathiDepartment of Biotechnology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
B O NyongesaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Eldoret, Eldoret, Kenya.
B A WereDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Eldoret, Eldoret, Kenya.
University of Eldoret · KEGraphic Era University · INUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural areas exhibiting numerous abiotic stressors, such as elevated water stress, temperatures, and salinity, have grown as a result of climate change. As such, abiotic stresses are some of the most pressing issues in contemporary agricultural production. Understanding plant responses to abiotic stressors is important for global food security, climate change adaptation, and improving crop resilience for sustainable agriculture, Over the decades, explorations have been made concerning plant tolerance to these environmental stresses. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and their phytohormones are some of the players involved in developing resistance to abiotic stress in plants. Several studies have investigated the part of phytohormones in the ability of plants to withstand and adapt to non-living environmental factors, but very few have focused on rhizobacterial hormonal signaling and crosstalk that mediate abiotic stress tolerance in plants. The main objective of this review is to evaluate the functions of PGPR phytohormones in plant abiotic stress tolerance and outline the current research on rhizobacterial hormonal communication and crosstalk that govern plant abiotic stress responses. The review also includes the gene networks and regulation under diverse abiotic stressors. The review is important for understanding plant responses to abiotic stresses using PGPR phytohormones and hormonal signaling. It is envisaged that PGPR offer a useful approach to increasing plant tolerance to various abiotic stresses. However, further studies can reveal the unclear patterns of hormonal interactions between plants and rhizobacteria that mediate abiotic stress tolerance.

Indexed as

abiotic stress tolerancedrought stressphytohormonesplant growth promoting rhizobacteriatemperature stresswater stress

Identifiers

PMID37455718
PMCPMC10347528
OpenAlexW4382786849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.