Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37455681›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2023

Step by Step in Argentina: Putting Abortion Rights into Practice.

Silvina Ramos, Brianna Keefe-Oates, Mariana Romero, Agustina Ramon Michel, Mercedes Krause, Caitlin Gerdts, Alicia Ely Yamin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Choosing to Provide: Early Medical Abortion and Clinician Conscience in Ireland.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silvina RamosDepartment of Health, Economy, and Society, Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-2787-2138
Brianna Keefe-OatesIbis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mariana RomeroDepartment of Health, Economy, and Society, Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Agustina Ramon MichelDepartment of Health, Economy, and Society, Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mercedes KrauseDepartment of Health, Economy, and Society, Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-3724-6413
Caitlin GerdtsIbis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA.
Alicia Ely YaminHarvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In December of 2020, the Argentine Congress legalized abortion through 14 weeks, vastly increasing access to abortion care in the country. The law's passage followed years of advocacy for abortion rights in Argentina - including mass public and civil society mobilization, vocal support from an established pool of abortion providers who offered abortion services under specific legal exceptions prior to the new law, and the growth of community groups such as the Socorristas en Red who provide support for people to self-manage abortions. Aided by ample political will, the number of health facilities offering services increased substantially after the law was passed, and the public visibility around the law has helped assure people seeking abortion that it is their right. Proyecto mirar is an initiative focused on both gathering and using qualitative and quantitative data to inform stakeholders about the progress and obstacles of the law's implementation. In this review, we present an overall summary of the first two years of implementation of the abortion law in Argentina based on proyecto mirar data and contextualized through the historical processes that have contributed to the law's passage and application. While we see increases in abortion services and improved public perception around abortion rights, inequities in access and quality of care persist throughout the country. Specifically, providers in some regions are well trained, while others create obstacles to access, and in some regions health services provide high quality abortion care whereas others provide substandard care. To be sure, the implementation of public policies does not happen overnight; it requires government support and backing to tackle obstacles and solve implementation problems. Our findings suggest that when new abortion laws are passed, they must be supported by civil society and government leaders to ensure that associated policies are well crafted and monitored to ensure successful implementation.

Indexed as

abortionArgentinapolicy implementationreproductive health

Identifiers

PMID37455681
PMCPMC10349583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.