Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37455607›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

Arthropods are kin: Operationalizing Indigenous data sovereignty to respectfully utilize genomic data from Indigenous lands.

Leke Hutchins, Ann Mc Cartney, Natalie Graham, Rosemary Gillespie, Aidee Guzman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Considerations for biobanking of nonhuman genome data connected to Indigenous Peoples and lands.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leke HutchinsDepartment of Environmental Sciences Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0579-6488
Ann Mc CartneyUC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Natalie GrahamDepartment of Environmental Sciences Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7704-1132
Rosemary GillespieDepartment of Environmental Sciences Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0086-7424
Aidee GuzmanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

Berkeley Food Institute Faculty Seed GrantNational Science Foundation Innovations at the Nexus of Food, Energy, and Water Systems
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous peoples have cultivated biodiverse agroecosystems since time immemorial. The rise of metagenomics and high-throughput sequencing technologies in biodiversity studies has rapidly expanded the scale of data collection from these lands. A respectful approach to the data life cycle grounded in the sovereignty of indigenous communities is imperative to not perpetuate harm. In this paper, we operationalize an indigenous data sovereignty (IDS) framework to outline realistic considerations for genomic data that span data collection, governance, and communication. As a case study for this framework, we use arthropod genomic data collected from diversified and simplified farm sites close to and far from natural habitats within a historic Kānaka 'Ōiwi (Indigenous Hawaiian) agroecosystem. Diversified sites had the highest Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) richness for native and introduced arthropods. There may be a significant spillover effect between forest and farm sites, as farm sites near a natural habitat had higher OTU richness than those farther away. We also provide evidence that management factors such as the number of Polynesian crops cultivated may drive arthropod community composition. Through this case study, we emphasize the context-dependent opportunities and challenges for operationalizing IDS by utilizing participatory research methods, expanding novel data management tools through the Local Contexts Hub, and developing and nurturing community partnerships-all while highlighting the potential of agroecosystems for arthropod conservation. Overall, the workflow and the example presented here can help researchers take tangible steps to achieve IDS, which often seems elusive with the expanding use of genomic data.

Indexed as

ArthropodsAnimalsBiodiversityEcosystemGenomicsHawaiiHumansIndigenous PeoplesMetagenomicsagroecologybioculturalbiodiversity conservationdata governanceDNA metabarcoding

Identifiers

PMID37455607
PMCPMC11696483
OpenAlexW4384493048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.