Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37455534›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2023

Positive Bubble Study But No Evidence of Interatrial Defect in a Patient with Recurrent Cryptogenic Stroke.

Nika Samadzadeh Tabrizi, Perry A Stout, Joseph Cahill, Imran Ramzan Sunesara, Patrick Chan, Chanderdeep Singh, Thomas Fabian, Alexander D Shapeton, Sridhar Reddy Musuku

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 70% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nika Samadzadeh TabriziAlbany Medical College, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7391-088X
Perry A StoutAlbany Medical College, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2618-4533
Joseph CahillDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5545-7073
Imran Ramzan SunesaraHouston Methodist Debakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, United States.
Patrick ChanDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, New York, United States.
Chanderdeep SinghDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2838-9620
Thomas FabianDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4306-033X
Alexander D ShapetonDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Tufts University Faculty of Medicine, Boston, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2014-1367
Sridhar Reddy MusukuDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Albany Medical Center, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3192-7792
Albany Medical Center Hospital · USBoston University · USHouston Methodist · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) can be asymptomatic or result in a range of complications such as brain abscesses or cryptogenic emboli, which can contribute to morbidity and mortality if not diagnosed and treated in a timely manner. To date, there have been several reports of delayed diagnosis of PAVMs, which have been largely attributed to the misconception that PAVMs are too rare to be of clinical significance. Furthermore, because intracardiac shunting secondary to a patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD) also results in a positive saline contrast study with echocardiography, PAVM can be easily misdiagnosed as an intracardiac right-toleft shunt. However, there are unique echocardiographic features that differentiate between intracardiac shunting due to a PFO or ASD and extracardiac shunting such as in PAVM. This case details the course of a patient with recurrent cryptogenic strokes that was initially misattributed to a PFO and was only correctly diagnosed with multiple PAVMs after two failed attempts at PFO closure. This case serves as a reminder of an alternative etiology of right-to-left shunt and its presentation on imaging, which echocardiographers must be familiar with.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous malformationechocardiographyischemic strokepatent foramen ovalesaline contrast study

Identifiers

PMID37455534
PMCPMC10339743
OpenAlexW4380884302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.