Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37455438›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2023

Pre-anaesthesia Telephone Consultation: A Safe Alternative for Anaesthesia Assessment in Case of Repeated Low or Intermediate Risk Surgeries: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Charles-Herve Vacheron, Clemence Ferrier, Estelle Morau, Alexandre Theissen, Vincent Piriou, Pierre Yves Carry, Arnaud Friggeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Advances in telemedicine implementation for preoperative assessment: a call to action.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charles-Herve VacheronDepartment of Anaesthesia Resuscitation, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1575-5847
Clemence FerrierDepartment of Anaesthesia Resuscitation, Centre Hospitalier de Mayotte, Mamoudzou, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3155-9136
Estelle MorauDepartment Anaesthesia Resuscitation, Douleur Urgence CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6793-7859
Alexandre TheissenDepartment of Anaesthesia Resuscitation, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grâce, Monaco, Monako.ORCID 0000-0002-5586-8582
Vincent PiriouDepartment of Anaesthesia Resuscitation, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6900-1480
Pierre Yves CarryDepartment of Anaesthesia Resuscitation, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8310-5195
Arnaud FriggeriCIRI-International Center for Infectiology Research (Team PHE3ID), Univ Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4687-2173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Telemedicine has widely expanded during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, effectiveness, and satisfaction of pre-anaesthesia telephone consultation (PATC). Methods: From December 2015 to October 2016, a prospective survey was administered to anaesthesiologists, nurse anaesthetists, and patients of the ambulatory and maxillofacial departments. Patients having a pre-anaesthesia consultation (PAC) within the previous year in the department, whose health state was considered stable, and for whom the surgical procedure was related to the previous one, were eligible for PATC. Three questionnaires concerning the pre- (Q1), per- (Q2), and postoperative (Q3) periods were answered by the patient, the anaesthesiologist, and the anaesthesiologist nurse to evaluate the feasibility and satisfaction of the PATC. We collected the cancelation rate and any incident occurring during the surgery. Results: Over the study period, 210 patients were included. The response rate was 200/210 (95.2%) for Q1, 108/208 (51.9%) for Q2 and 146/208 (70.2%) for Q3. PATC was performed in a median (IQR) of 13 (7-20) days before the procedure. Patients answered directly in 73% of cases without the need for recall. During surgery, 4 incidents occurred and none were attributable to PATC. Patient satisfaction was 93.3% and 85.8% of them preferred PATC to conventional PAC. The kilometric saving was 74 (30-196) km per PATC. Conclusion: Both patients and professionals were satisfied with PATC, which did not impact safety. On the selected patients, PATC brings many practical benefits and increases organizational flexibility.

Indexed as

Anaesthesiaconsultationtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37455438
PMCPMC10339756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.