ReviewThe plant genome2024
What plant breeding may (and may not) look like in 2050?
Review in The plant genome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breeding Climate-Resilient Soybeans for 2050 and Beyond: Leveraging Novel Technologies to Mitigate Yield Stagnation and Climate Change Impacts.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Editorial: Trends and perspectives for the use of crop wild relatives in crop breeding, volume II.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Special Issue: "Molecular Genetics and Plant Breeding, 5th Edition".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Integrating molecular genetics with plant breeding to deliver impact.Plant physiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Early detection ofData in brief · 2025Article
- Future of durum wheat research and breeding: Insights from early career researchers.The plant genome · 2025Review
- Genetic improvement of robusta coffee (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- A bi-stage data-driven process-based model for sorghum breeding and yield prediction: coupling explainable artificial intelligence and crop modeling.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Epistasis and pleiotropy-induced variation for plant breeding.Plant biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Harnessing Multi-Omics Strategies and Bioinformatics Innovations for Advancing Soybean Improvement: A Comprehensive Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Exploring the genomics of abiotic stress tolerance and crop resilience to climate change.The plant genome · 2024Article
- What plant breeding may (and may not) look like in 2050?The plant genome · 2024Review
- Durum wheat heat tolerance loci defined via a north-south gradient.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Biocultural diversity and crop improvement.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2023Review
- Advancements in Water-Saving Strategies and Crop Adaptation to Drought: A Comprehensive Review.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
At the turn of 2000 many authors envisioned future plant breeding. Twenty years after, which of those authors' visions became reality or not, and which ones may become so in the years to come. After two decades of debates, climate change is a "certainty," food systems shifted from maximizing farm production to reducing environmental impact, and hopes placed into GMOs are mitigated by their low appreciation by consumers. We revise herein how plant breeding may raise or reduce genetic gains based on the breeder's equation. "Accuracy of Selection" has significantly improved by many experimental-scale field and laboratory implements, but also by vulgarizing statistical models, and integrating DNA markers into selection. Pre-breeding has really promoted the increase of useful "Genetic Variance." Shortening "Recycling Time" has seen great progression, to the point that achieving a denominator equal to "1" is becoming a possibility. Maintaining high "Selection Intensity" remains the biggest challenge, since adding any technology results in a higher cost per progeny, despite the steady reduction in cost per datapoint. Furthermore, the concepts of variety and seed enterprise might change with the advent of cheaper genomic tools to monitor their use and the promotion of participatory or citizen science. The technological and societal changes influence the new generation of plant breeders, moving them further away from field work, emphasizing instead the use of genomic-based selection methods relying on big data. We envisage what skills plant breeders of tomorrow might need to address challenges, and whether their time in the field may dwindle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.