SynthesisInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2026
Direct percutaneous puncture versus transarterial embolization for head and neck paragangliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endovascular Embolization as a Stand-Alone Treatment of Head and Neck Paragangliomas with Long-Term Tumor Control.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Quantifying extent of meningioma preoperative embolization through volumetric analysis: A retrospective case series.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024Article
- The effect of preoperative embolization rate on surgical outcomes for carotid paraganglioma resection.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionEmbolization of head and neck paragangliomas (HNPs) is a well-established treatment strategy and adjunctive therapy. However, the optimal mode of intervention, whether by direct percutaneous puncture (DP) or via transarterial embolization (TAE), remains unclear.MethodsThe aim of this study was to complete a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of DP versus TAE for HNP embolization. The Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases were used to identify studies describing the clinical outcomes of either DP or TAE for HNP embolization. Outcome measures included: complete angiographic devascularization, major complications, and minor complications. Pooled rates were calculated for each variable which were then compared with meta-regression using a random effects model.ResultsThirty-one retrospective studies met inclusion criteria, detailing 394 patients with 411 HNPs. Overall, DP was associated with a higher rate of complete devascularization (91.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.6% to 97.4%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.