Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37454352›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Physician-level determinants of HCV screening during pregnancy in a U.S. sample.

Jonathan D Moore, Uyen-Sa D T Nguyen, Rohit P Ojha, Stacey B Griner, Erika L Thompson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. From Guidelines to Real-Time Conversation: Expert-Validated Retrieval-Augmented and Fine-Tuned GPT-4 for Hepatitis C Management.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan D MooreSchool of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, USA. jonm97@aol.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-9804
Uyen-Sa D T NguyenSchool of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, USA.
Rohit P OjhaSchool of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, USA.
Stacey B GrinerSchool of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, USA.
Erika L ThompsonSchool of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, USA.
University of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the association between select determinants and HCV screening guideline adherence among physicians who provide prenatal care. RESEARCH QUESTION: What factors may act as determinants of guideline adherence to HCV screening among physicians who provide prenatal care?

methodsWe surveyed a national sample of physicians who provided prenatal care in 2021. The survey included questions from the Clinician Guideline Determinant (CGD) questionnaire, demographic characteristics, and medical practice characteristics. We estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using semi-Bayesian logistic regression for the association between determinants and guideline adherence.

resultsParticipants included 224 physicians in the United States who reported providing prenatal care. Most physicians practiced in private practice (65%) and the majority were members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG; 91%). Less than half (43%; 95% CI: 36%-49%) of physicians reported regular use of the HCV screening guideline. Physicians who reported general knowledge about HCV (OR = 9.0, 95% CI 3.1-30) or endorsed agreement with ease of implementation (OR = 8.0, 95% CI 2.7-25) had higher odds of adherence to the HCV screening guideline.

conclusionOur study suggests that less than half of practicing prenatal care physicians adhere to HCV screening guidelines for pregnant patients. Our results may be useful as a preliminary screening of select determinants of guideline use for further investigation.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceHepatitis CMass ScreeningPractice Patterns, Physicians'Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObstetricsPhysiciansPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesGuideline adherenceHepatitis CPrenatalScreening

Identifiers

PMID37454352
OpenAlexW4384470775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.