ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Potential utility of [
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preliminary study of FAP-targeted radiopharmaceuticals based on covalent targeting strategy and pharmacokinetic characteristics.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Distinguishing benign from malignant lesions with high [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- The Role of Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor Positron Emission Tomography in Inflammatory and Infectious Diseases: An Updated Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A retrospective study ofFrontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Preliminary Exploration of AlMolecular imagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the detection performance of [
methodsThis prospective study included 89 patients who underwent [
resultsThis study comprised 53 men and 58 women (mean age, 53 ± 15.75 years). [
conclusion[ CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our study showed that [ KEY POINTS: • [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.