ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023
Clinical impact of a celiac axis stenosis in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Celiac axis stenosis as an overlooked extrapancreatic predictor of fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Severe Proximal Celiac Trunk Stenosis Without Significant Aortic Atherosclerosis: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCeliac axis stenosis (CAS) often is an incidental finding in terms of diagnostic for hepatobiliary surgery since most cases remain asymptomatic. It remains unclear whether CAS is a risk factor for postoperative complications after hepatobiliary surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an asymptomatic CAS on the postoperative morbidity and survival of patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed CT scans and clinicopathological data of 250 consecutive patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery between 2011 and 2018 in our tertiary center. We compared the postoperative course between patients with and without an incidental CAS as well as their overall survival.
resultsCAS was caused by atherosclerotic stenosis in 16 (64%) patients, by ligamentous stenosis in 4 (16%) and by combined conditions in 5 cases (20%). Mean age of patients in the CAS group was significantly higher in comparison to patients of the non-CAS group (71.0 vs. 59.1 years, p < 0.001). Major hepatectomy was conducted in 40% of the CAS patients and 19.6% of non-CAS patients, respectively (p = 0.036). Interestingly, no statistically significant differences in postoperative morbidity (40 vs. 46.2%, p = 0.673) or in overall survival between the groups (41.3 vs. 51.9 months, p = 0.611) were observed.
conclusionOur analysis found no correlation between an asymptomatic celiac axis stenosis and postoperative complications or overall survival after hepatobiliary surgery. Which impact the incidental CAS may have in highly complex cases remains unclear. Further studies are needed to identify patients who benefit from CAS treatment before hepatobiliary surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.