Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37454295›Full record

ArticleCell reports2023

ATR protects ongoing and newly assembled DNA replication forks through distinct mechanisms.

Wendy Leung, Antoine Simoneau, Sneha Saxena, Jessica Jackson, Parasvi S Patel, Mangsi Limbu, Alessandro Vindigni, Lee Zou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wendy LeungMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Antoine SimoneauMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Sneha SaxenaMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Jessica JacksonDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Parasvi S PatelMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Mangsi LimbuDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Alessandro VindigniDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: avindigni@wustl.edu.
Lee ZouMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: lee.zou@duke.edu.
Harvard University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Project 2: Combined personal neoantigen-targeting cancer vaccines with immune checkpoint blockade for ovarian cancerP50CA240243 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI CASTRO, CESAR M · 2020 to 2024
$11.5M
Understanding and targeting the DNA replication stress in cancer cellsR35CA263934 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Lee Zou · 2021 to 2026
$5.2M
Mechanisms of replication fork protection and recoveryR01CA248526 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Alessandro Vindigni, Lee Zou · 2020 to 2026
$3.6M
Replication fork repriming versus reversalR01CA237263 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Alessandro Vindigni · 2019 to 2026
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA240243NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237263NCI NIH HHS R01 CA248526NCI NIH HHS R35 CA263934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ATR kinase safeguards genomic integrity during S phase, but how ATR protects DNA replication forks remains incompletely understood. Here, we combine four distinct assays to analyze ATR functions at ongoing and newly assembled replication forks upon replication inhibition by hydroxyurea. At ongoing forks, ATR inhibitor (ATRi) increases MRE11- and EXO1-mediated nascent DNA degradation from PrimPol-generated, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps. ATRi also exposes template ssDNA through fork uncoupling and nascent DNA degradation. Electron microscopy reveals that ATRi reduces reversed forks by increasing gap-dependent nascent DNA degradation. At new forks, ATRi triggers MRE11- and CtIP-initiated template DNA degradation by EXO1, exposing nascent ssDNA. Upon PARP inhibition, ATRi preferentially exacerbates gap-dependent nascent DNA degradation at ongoing forks in BRCA1/2-deficient cells and disrupts the restored gap protection in BRCA1-deficient, PARP-inhibitor-resistant cells. Thus, ATR protects ongoing and new forks through distinct mechanisms, providing an extended view of ATR's functions in stabilizing replication forks.

Indexed as

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBRCA1 ProteinDNA-Binding ProteinsBRCA2 ProteinDNA ReplicationDNA, Single-StrandedHumansPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATR protein, humanBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsATRBRCACP: Molecular biologygapsPARP inhibitorreplicationreplication forksingle-stranded DNA

Identifiers

PMID37454295
PMCPMC10529362
OpenAlexW4384432207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.