SynthesisJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2023
Effectiveness and safety of Angong Niuhuang pill in treatment of acute stroke: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Angong Niuhuang pill (, ANP) in the treatment of acute stroke. This can provide ideas and basis for the treatment of this disease with integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine.
methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) of China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang Database, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from the establishment to March 2022. Two researchers screened the literature and extracted the data according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.
resultsA total of 28 RCTs were included, including 2745 patients in the acute stage of stroke (1375 in the experimental group and 1370 in the control group). Meta-analysis showed that compared with conventional treatment, combined treatment with ANP could improve the effective rate of acute stroke patients [relative risk () = 1.26, 95% confidence interval () (1.21, 1.31)], Glasgow Coma Scale scores [mean difference () = 2.01, 95% (1.04, 2.98)], Mini-mental State Examination scores [ = 4.79, 95% (2.22, 7.37)], Activities of Daily Living scores [ = 15.70, 95% (14.05, 17.36)] and the Barthel index scores [ = 13.89, 95% (12.12, 15.65)], reduce National Institute of Health stroke scale scores [ = -3.90, 95% (-4.96, -2.84)] and serum brain natriuretic peptide [ = -38.50, 95% (-46.85, -30.15)]. In terms of safety, the incidence of adverse reactions showed no statistical differences between the two groups [ = 0.71, 95% (0.43, 1.15), = 0.16], and no serious adverse reactions/events were observed, indicating a good safety.
conclusionsExisting clinical research evidence shows that ANP has good efficacy and safety in the treatment of acute stroke, which can provide a basis for the treatment of integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine. However, the quality of included research methodology needs to be improved, and the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.