Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37454235›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Identifying oscillatory brain networks with hidden Gaussian graphical spectral models of MEEG.

Deirel Paz-Linares, Eduardo Gonzalez-Moreira, Ariosky Areces-Gonzalez, Ying Wang, Min Li, Eduardo Martinez-Montes, Jorge Bosch-Bayard, Maria L Bringas-Vega, Mitchell Valdes-Sosa, Pedro A Valdes-Sosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Deirel Paz-LinaresThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Eduardo Gonzalez-MoreiraThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Ariosky Areces-GonzalezThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Ying WangThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Min LiThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Eduardo Martinez-MontesDepartment of Neuroinformatics, Cuban Neuroscience Center, Havana, Cuba.
Jorge Bosch-BayardDepartment of Neuroinformatics, Cuban Neuroscience Center, Havana, Cuba.
Maria L Bringas-VegaThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2507-1959
Mitchell Valdes-SosaThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Pedro A Valdes-SosaThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. pedro.valdes@neuroinformatics-collaboratory.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5485-2661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the functional networks underpinning indirectly observed processes poses an inverse problem for neurosciences or other fields. A solution of such inverse problems estimates as a first step the activity emerging within functional networks from EEG or MEG data. These EEG or MEG estimates are a direct reflection of functional brain network activity with a temporal resolution that no other in vivo neuroimage may provide. A second step estimating functional connectivity from such activity pseudodata unveil the oscillatory brain networks that strongly correlate with all cognition and behavior. Simulations of such MEG or EEG inverse problem also reveal estimation errors of the functional connectivity determined by any of the state-of-the-art inverse solutions. We disclose a significant cause of estimation errors originating from misspecification of the functional network model incorporated into either inverse solution steps. We introduce the Bayesian identification of a Hidden Gaussian Graphical Spectral (HIGGS) model specifying such oscillatory brain networks model. In human EEG alpha rhythm simulations, the estimation errors measured as ROC performance do not surpass 2% in our HIGGS inverse solution and reach 20% in state-of-the-art methods. Macaque simultaneous EEG/ECoG recordings provide experimental confirmation for our results with 1/3 times larger congruence according to Riemannian distances than state-of-the-art methods.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingAlpha RhythmAnimalsBayes TheoremElectrocorticographyElectroencephalographyHumansMacacaMagnetoencephalographyModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID37454235
PMCPMC10349891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.