Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37454219›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

In vitro and in vivo characterization of SARS-CoV-2 resistance to ensitrelvir.

Maki Kiso, Seiya Yamayoshi, Shun Iida, Yuri Furusawa, Yuichiro Hirata, Ryuta Uraki, Masaki Imai, Tadaki Suzuki, Yoshihiro Kawaoka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Next-generation inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 MNature communications · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Discovery of benzyl carbamate inhibitors of coronavirus MJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A SARS-CoV-2 MNature communications · 2025
    Article
  15. iScience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maki KisoDivision of Virology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Seiya YamayoshiDivision of Virology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. yamayo@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-7768-5157
Shun IidaDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2258-9031
Yuri FurusawaDivision of Virology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichiro HirataDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryuta UrakiDivision of Virology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0890-1922
Masaki ImaiDivision of Virology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6988-1975
Tadaki SuzukiDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3820-9542
Yoshihiro KawaokaDivision of Virology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. yoshihiro.kawaoka@wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5061-8296
Tokyo University of Science · JPNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensitrelvir, an oral antiviral agent that targets a SARS-CoV-2 main protease (3CLpro or Nsp5), is clinically useful against SARS-CoV-2 including its omicron variants. Since most omicron subvariants have reduced sensitivity to most monoclonal antibody therapies, SARS-CoV-2 resistance to other antivirals including main protease inhibitors such as ensitrelvir is a major public health concern. Here, repeating passages of SARS-CoV-2 in the presence of ensitrelvir revealed that the M49L and E166A substitutions in Nsp5 are responsible for reduced sensitivity to ensitrelvir. Both substitutions reduced in vitro virus growth in the absence of ensitrelvir. The combination of the M49L and E166A substitutions allowed the virus to largely evade the suppressive effect of ensitrelvir in vitro. The virus possessing Nsp5-M49L showed similar pathogenicity to wild-type virus, whereas the virus possessing Nsp5-E166A or Nsp5-M49L/E166A slightly attenuated. Ensitrelvir treatment of hamsters infected with the virus possessing Nsp5-M49L/E166A was ineffective; however, nirmatrelvir or molnupiravir treatment was effective. Therefore, it is important to closely monitor the emergence of ensitrelvir-resistant SARS-CoV-2 variants to guide antiviral treatment selection.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnimalsAntiviral AgentsCricetinaeIndazolesSARS-CoV-2TriazinesTriazolesAntiviral AgentsensitrelvirIndazolesTriazinesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID37454219
PMCPMC10349878
OpenAlexW4384407741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.