Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37454212›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2023

Validation of a method for the dry preservation and rehydration of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato for parity analysis to assess the impact of vector control measures in the field.

Elizabeth Pretorius, Mojca Kristan, John Bradley, Eunice Teixeira da Silva, Harry Hutchins, Fatucha Barri, Ansumane Cassama, Sainey Ceesay, Mamadou Ousmane Ndiath, Amabelia Rodrigues and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elizabeth PretoriusDepartment for Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. elizabeth.pretorius@lshtm.ac.uk.
Mojca KristanDepartment for Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
John BradleyClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Eunice Teixeira da SilvaProjecto de Saúde Bandim, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Harry HutchinsClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Fatucha BarriProjecto de Saúde Bandim, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Ansumane CassamaProjecto de Saúde Bandim, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Sainey CeesayMedical Research Council Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Mamadou Ousmane NdiathMedical Research Council Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Amabelia RodriguesProjecto de Saúde Bandim, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
James G LoganDepartment for Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Anna LastClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Robert T JonesDepartment for Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S005013/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the control of malaria remains heavily dependent on vector management interventions, it is important to understand the impact of these on mosquito populations. Age-grading is a valuable tool for this; however, logistical challenges in remote, resource-poor areas make current methodologies difficult to incorporate into clinical trials and routine surveillance. Our aim was to validate a methodology that could be easily implemented in such settings. Using dried mosquito specimens instead of freshly killed ones, we validated the commonly used ovarian tracheation technique for assessing population age structure.

methodsLaboratory-reared Anopheles coluzzii mosquitoes with known parity status were dry preserved in silica gel for up to 12 weeks and rehydrated prior to parity assessment. The results were compared to parity results for freshly killed mosquitoes from the same colony. Preserved, field-caught Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) from Guinea-Bissau were assessed by three different assessors blinded to each other's scores. An overall index of agreement was calculated using inter-rater reliability of all assessor pairings. The impact of preservation time was investigated using a one-way ANOVA to look for differences in assessor agreement over three time periods.

resultsThe parity status was correctly identified for 90% of dry preserved and rehydrated insectary-reared An. coluzzii and for 98% of freshly killed insectary-reared An. coluzzii. The inter-rater reliability was highest (0.94) for freshly killed An. coluzzii. The results for all time points showed excellent strength of agreement between assessors. For field-caught An. gambiae s.l., the overall index of agreement between all three assessors was 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.78-0.93), indicating almost perfect agreement. There was no significant difference between assessor agreement between time frames.

conclusionsDry preserving and rehydrating Anopheles mosquitoes provides an alternative to using freshly killed mosquitoes to assess the efficacy of a control intervention in remote settings where it is logistically difficult to dissect fresh specimens. This method also provides the flexibility required for parity assessment to be done on larger scales over bigger areas.

Indexed as

AnophelesAnimalsFluid TherapyMosquito VectorsReproducibility of ResultsAge-gradingAnophelesGuinea-BissauMalariaMosquitoParityVector control

Identifiers

PMID37454212
PMCPMC10349412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.