ArticleScientific reports2023
Active learning for prediction of tensile properties for material extrusion additive manufacturing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- HMQ-ES-Stack-GBR: A Hybrid Ensemble Learning Model for Mechanical and Physical Quality Prediction in FDM 3D Printing.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models for Optimal Prediction of Printed-Line Features in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Constituent-Material-Anchored Continual Learning for Full Stress-Strain Prediction of Multi-Material PETG/PC-ABS MEX Laminates.Polymers · 2026Article
- Article
- Predictive Correlation Between Hardness and Tensile Properties of Submerged Arc Welded API X70 Steel.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Smart extrusion via data-driven prediction of grain size and peripheral coarse grain defect formation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine Learning in Polymer Research.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning techniques were used to predict tensile properties of material extrusion-based additively manufactured parts made with Technomelt PA 6910, a hot melt adhesive. An adaptive data generation technique, specifically an active learning process based on the Gaussian process regression algorithm, was employed to enable prediction with limited training data. After three rounds of data collection, machine learning models based on linear regression, ridge regression, Gaussian process regression, and K-nearest neighbors were tasked with predicting properties for the test dataset, which consisted of parts fabricated with five processing parameters chosen using a random number generator. Overall, linear regression and ridge regression successfully predicted output parameters, with < 10% error for 56% of predictions. K-nearest neighbors performed worse than linear regression and ridge regression, with < 10% error for 32% of predictions and 10-20% error for 60% of predictions. While Gaussian process regression performed with the lowest accuracy (< 10% error for 32% of prediction cases and 10-20% error for 40% of predictions), it benefited most from the adaptive data generation technique. This work demonstrates that machine learning models using adaptive data generation techniques can efficiently predict properties of additively manufactured structures with limited training data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.