Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37454025›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2023

Opioid, sedative, preadmission medication and iatrogenic withdrawal risk in UK adult critically ill patients: a point prevalence study.

Rebekah Eadie, Cathrine A McKenzie, Daniel Hadfield, Nicola J Kalk, Scott Bolesta, Martin Dempster, Daniel F McAuley, Bronagh Blackwood, UK ALERT-ICU study investigators

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Challenges of the Regional Anesthetic Techniques in Intensive Care Units - A Narrative Review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Scheduled intravenous opioids.Intensive care medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebekah EadieWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine and Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queens University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Cathrine A McKenzieNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, Perioperative and Critical Care Theme and NIHR Applied Research Collaborative (ARC), University of Southampton, Wessex, Southampton, S016 6YD, UK. c.mckenzie@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-9711
Daniel HadfieldCentre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care and Department of Addiction, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Cancer and Pharmacy, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0334-7221
Nicola J KalkCentre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care and Department of Addiction, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Cancer and Pharmacy, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-9243
Scott BolestaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Nesbitt School of Pharmacy, Wilkes University, 84 West South Street, Wilkes-Barre, PA, 18766, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5792-6283
Martin DempsterWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine and Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queens University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9499-3186
Daniel F McAuleyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine and Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queens University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-1947
Bronagh BlackwoodWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine and Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queens University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4583-5381
UK ALERT-ICU study investigators
Queen's University Belfast · GBKing's College London · GBWilkes University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIatrogenic withdrawal syndrome, after exposure medication known to cause withdrawal is recognised, yet under described in adult intensive care.

aimTo investigate, opioid, sedation, and preadmission medication practice in critically ill adults with focus on aspects associated with iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome.

methodOne-day point prevalence study in UK intensive care units (ICUs). We collected ICU admission medication and/or substances with withdrawal potential, sedation policy, opioid and sedative use, dose, and duration.

resultsThirty-seven from 39 participating ICUs contributed data from 386 patients. The prevalence rate for parenteral opioid and sedative medication was 56.1% (212 patients). Twenty-three ICUs (59%) had no sedation/analgesia policy, and no ICUs screened for iatrogenic withdrawal. Patient admission medications with withdrawal-potential included antidepressants or antipsychotics (43, 20.3%) and nicotine (41, 19.3%). Of 212 patients, 202 (95.3%) received opioids, 163 (76.9%) sedatives and 153 (72.2%) both. Two hundred and two (95.3%) patients received opioids: 167 (82.7%) by continuous infusions and 90 (44.6%) patients for longer than 96-h. One hundred and sixty-three (76.9%) patients received sedatives: 157 (77.7%) by continuous infusions and 74 (45.4%) patients for longer than 96-h.

conclusionOpioid sedative and admission medication with iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome potential prevalence rates were high, and a high proportion of ICUs had no sedative/analgesic policies. Nearly half of patients received continuous opioids and sedatives for longer than 96-h placing them at high risk of iatrogenic withdrawal. No participating unit reported using a validated tool for iatrogenic withdrawal assessment.

Indexed as

Hypnotics and SedativesSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCritical IllnessHumansIatrogenic DiseasePrevalenceUnited KingdomAnalgesics, OpioidHypnotics and SedativesAnalgesicsCross-sectional studyOpioids critical careSedatives

Identifiers

PMID37454025
PMCPMC10600273
OpenAlexW4384405641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.