Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37453930›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2023

Immune checkpoint inhibitors promising role in cancer therapy: clinical evidence and immune-related adverse events.

Seyed Mohammadmahdi Meybodi, Bahareh Farasati Far, Ali Pourmolaei, Farid Baradarbarjastehbaf, Maryam Safaei, Niloufar Mohammadkhani, Ali Akbar Samadani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Seyed Mohammadmahdi MeybodiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
Bahareh Farasati FarDepartment of Chemistry, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, 1684613114, Iran. Farasatifar_bahareh@cmps2.iust.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1598-2487
Ali PourmolaeiBabol Noshirvani University of Technology, Shariati Ave, Babol, Mazandaran, Iran.
Farid BaradarbarjastehbafFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Maryam SafaeiDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Eastern Mediterranean University, 99628, Famagusta, Turkey.
Niloufar MohammadkhaniDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Akbar SamadaniGuilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. a_a_hormoz@yahoo.com.
Babol Noshirvani University of Technology · IREastern Mediterranean University · CYGuilan University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Science and Technology · IRIslamic Azad University of Tabriz · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to noteworthy progressions in the management of diverse cancer types, as evidenced by the pioneering "ipilimumab" medication authorized by US FDA in 2011. Importantly, ICIs agents have demonstrated encouraging potential in bringing about transformation across diverse forms of cancer by selectively targeting the immune checkpoint pathways that are exploited by cancerous cells for dodging the immune system, culminating in progressive and favorable health outcomes for patients. The primary mechanism of action (MOA) of ICIs involves blocking inhibitory immune checkpoints. There are three approved categories including Programmed Death (PD-1) inhibitors (cemiplimab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab), Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) (Ipilimumab), and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PDL-1) (Avelumab). Although ICIs promisingly increase therapeutic response and cancer survival rates, using ICIs has demonstrated some limitations including autoimmune reactions and toxicities, requiring close monitoring. The present review endeavors to explicate the underlying principles of the MOA and pharmacokinetics of the approved ICIs in the realm of cancer induction, including an appraisal of their level of practice-based evidence.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyIpilimumabNivolumabImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumabCancer therapyICIsImmunotherapyTumor biomarker

Identifiers

PMID37453930
OpenAlexW4384408247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.