Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37453726›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2023

Sex differences in dominance relationships in Syrian hamsters.

Conner J Whitten, Mackenzie K Hooker, Ashley N Wells, Jessica N Kearney, Matthew S Jenkins, Matthew A Cooper

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Conner J WhittenDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Mackenzie K HookerDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Ashley N WellsDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Jessica N KearneyDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Matthew S JenkinsDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Matthew A CooperDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA. Electronic address: mcooper@utk.edu.
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

Mechanisms by which social experience promotes stress resilienceR15MH122946 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI COOPER, MATTHEW A · 2020 to 2020
$450k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH122946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dominance relationships are identified by changes in agonistic behavior toward specific individuals. While there are considerable individual and species differences in dominance relationships, sex differences are poorly understood in rodent models because aggression among female rodents is rare. The aim of this study was to characterize sex differences in the formation and maintenance of dominance relationships in same-sex pairs of male and female Syrian hamsters. We pooled data from multiple projects in our lab to evaluate dominance interactions in 68 male dyads and 88 female dyads. In each project, animals were matched with a partner similar in age, sex, and estrous cycle and we exposed animals to daily social encounters for two weeks in a resident-intruder format. We found that female hamsters were quicker to attack and attacked at higher rates compared to males regardless of dominance status. In addition, resident female hamsters were quicker to attack and attacked at higher rates than intruder females, but aggression in males did not depend on residency status. Female subordinates were quicker to submit and fled at higher rates from their dominant counterparts compared to male subordinates. Intruder subordinate females were quicker to submit and fled at higher rates than resident subordinate females. Females were also more resistant than males to becoming subordinate in that they fought back more consistently and were more likely to reverse their dominance status. These findings indicate that dominance relationships are less stable in females compared to males and that residency status has a larger impact on agonistic behavior in females than males. Overall, differences in how males and females display territorial aggression can lead to sex differences in the establishment and maintenance of dominance relationships.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSex CharacteristicsAggressionAnimalsCricetinaeDominance-SubordinationFemaleMaleMesocricetusSocial DominanceAggressionDefensive behaviorDominance relationshipsSex differencesSocial stressSubmission

Identifiers

PMID37453726
PMCPMC10529893
OpenAlexW4384156449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.