ArticleCurrent biology : CB2023
Wild nightingales flexibly match whistle pitch in real time.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time Segmentation and Classification of Birdsong Syllables for Learning Experiments.eNeuro · 2026Article
- Estimating the motor exploration in reinforcement learning.iScience · 2026Article
- Comparative approaches to the neurobiology of avian vocal learning.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2025Review
- Exploring nonlinear phenomena in animal vocalizations through oscillator theory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Social context affects sequence modification learning in birdsong.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Goal-directed vocal planning in a songbird.eLife · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interactive vocal communication, similar to a human conversation, requires flexible and real-time changes to vocal output in relation to preceding auditory stimuli. These vocal adjustments are essential to ensuring both the suitable timing and content of the interaction. Precise timing of dyadic vocal exchanges has been investigated in a variety of species, including humans. In contrast, the ability of non-human animals to accurately adjust specific spectral features of vocalization extemporaneously in response to incoming auditory information is less well studied. One spectral feature of acoustic signals is the fundamental frequency, which we perceive as pitch. Many animal species can discriminate between sound frequencies, but real-time detection and reproduction of an arbitrary pitch have only been observed in humans. Here, we show that nightingales in the wild can match the pitch of whistle songs while singing in response to conspecifics or pitch-controlled whistle playbacks. Nightingales matched whistles across their entire pitch production range indicating that they can flexibly tune their vocal output along a wide continuum. Prompt whistle pitch matches were more precise than delayed ones, suggesting the direct mapping of auditory information onto a motor command to achieve online vocal replication of a heard pitch. Although nightingales' songs follow annual cycles of crystallization and deterioration depending on breeding status, the observed pitch-matching behavior is present year-round, suggesting a stable neural circuit independent of seasonal changes in physiology. Our findings represent the first case of non-human instantaneous vocal imitation of pitch, highlighting a promising model for understanding sensorimotor transformation within an interactive context. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.