Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452987›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2023

Impact of Cardiac Motion on coronary artery calcium scoring using a virtual non-iodine algorithm on photon-counting detector CT: a dynamic phantom study.

Nicola Fink, Emese Zsarnoczay, U Joseph Schoepf, Jim O'Doherty, Moritz C Halfmann, Thomas Allmendinger, Junia Hagenauer, Joseph P Griffith, Milán Vecsey-Nagy, Daniel Pinos and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Dual-energy Computed Tomography in Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicola FinkDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Emese ZsarnoczayDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
U Joseph SchoepfDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. schoepf@musc.edu.
Jim O'DohertyDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Moritz C HalfmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg- University, Langenbeckstr. 1, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Thomas AllmendingerSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Siemensstr. 1, Forchheim, 91301, Germany.
Junia HagenauerSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Siemensstr. 1, Forchheim, 91301, Germany.
Joseph P GriffithDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Milán Vecsey-NagyDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Daniel PinosDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Ullrich EbersbergerDepartment of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, 80636, Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Akos Varga-SzemesDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Tilman EmrichDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USLMU Klinikum · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DESemmelweis University · HUSiemens Healthcare (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the impact of cardiac motion and in-vessel attenuation on coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring using virtual non-iodine (VNI) against virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstructions on photon-counting detector CT. Two artificial vessels containing calcifications and different in-vessel attenuations (500, 800HU) were scanned without (static) and with cardiac motion (60, 80, 100 beats per minute [bpm]). Images were post-processed using a VNC and VNI algorithm at 70 keV and quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) strength 2. Calcium mass, Agatston scores, cardiac motion susceptibility (CMS)-indices were compared to physical mass, static scores as well as between reconstructions, heart rates and in-vessel attenuations. VNI scores decreased with rising heart rate (p < 0.01) and showed less underestimation than VNC scores (p < 0.001). Only VNI scores were similar to the physical mass at static measurements, and to static scores at 60 bpm. Agatston scores using VNI were similar to static scores at 60 and 80 bpm. Standard deviation of CMS-indices was lower for VNI-based than for VNC-based CAC scoring. VNI scores were higher at 500 than 800HU (p < 0.001) and higher than VNC scores (p < 0.001) with VNI scores at 500 HU showing the lowest deviation from the physical reference. VNI-based CAC quantification is influenced by cardiac motion and in-vessel attenuation, but least when measuring Agatston scores, where it outperforms VNC-based CAC scoring.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsPhantoms, ImagingRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedVascular CalcificationHeart RateHumansPhotonsPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexCardiac motionCoronary artery calcium scoringIn-vessel attenuationPhoton-counting detector CTVirtual non-contrast algorithmVirtual non-iodine algorithm

Identifiers

PMID37452987
OpenAlexW4384406774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.