Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452985›Full record

ReviewObesity surgery2023

Surgical Management of Intra-gastric Balloon Complications, Single-Center Experience, and Literature Review.

Mohammed S Foula, Nasser M Amer, Hazem Zakaria, Mona H Ismail, Saeed J Alshomimi, Hassan M Al Bisher, Hassan Alsaleem, Khalifa Almulhim, Abdulaziz E Aldabaeab, Hefzi Alratrout and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mohammed S FoulaDepartment of Surgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia. msfoula@iau.edu.sa.ORCID 0000-0003-1951-635X
Nasser M AmerDepartment of Surgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Hazem ZakariaDepartment of Surgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Mona H IsmailDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Saeed J AlshomimiDepartment of Surgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan M Al BisherDepartment of Surgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan AlsaleemDepartment of Surgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Khalifa AlmulhimDepartment of Surgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz E AldabaeabDepartment of Surgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Hefzi AlratroutDepartment of Surgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Humood A AlsaderyDepartment of Surgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Mosab A AlarfajDepartment of Surgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Yasser M AljehaniDepartment of Surgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed M El DamatiDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn Saudi Arabia, the prevalence of obesity has multiplied in the last decades leading to a surge in bariatric surgery and other endoscopic modalities. The intra-gastric balloon (IGB) is the most used endoscopic modality. Surgical management for IGB complications is required for gastrointestinal perforation and/or obstruction. However, the literature seems to underestimate these complications. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective descriptive study was conducted in King Fahd University Hospital, Saudi Arabia, from Jan 2017 to Dec 2021, including all patients with complicated IGB who necessitated any surgical procedure. Exclusion criteria were patients with complicated IGBs that were only managed conservatively or endoscopically.

resultsA total of 326 patients were admitted with different complications after bariatric procedures. Of them, six patients were referred due to IGB complications that necessitated operative intervention. All patients were young females. Three patients had gastric wall perforation, and were managed by endoscopic removal of the IGBs followed by exploratory laparotomy. One patient had an intestinal obstruction on top of a migrated IGB that was surgically removed. One patient had failed endoscopic retrieval of IGB and required a laparoscopic gastrostomy. Another patient had an esophageal rupture that required left thoracotomy, pleural flap, and insertion of an esophageal stent. All cases were discharged and followed up with no related complications.

conclusionIGB is an endoscopic alternative, within specific indications, for the management of obesity. However, surgical management may be necessary to manage its complications, including gastrointestinal perforation, IGB migration, and failure of endoscopic removal.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastric BalloonObesity, MorbidStomach DiseasesFemaleHumansObesityRetrospective StudiesComplicationsEsophageal perforationGastric perforationIntestinal obstructionIntra-gastric balloonIntra-gastric balloon migration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.