ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2023
Ependymomas in Children and Adults.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Features and Prognostic Indicators for Brainstem Ependymomas : A Population-Based Retrospective Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database Analysis.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Non-invasive prediction of Ki-67 and p53 biomarkers in spinal ependymoma via deep learning: using multimodal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical data.Biomarker research · 2025Article
- Tumor size and treatment factors as correlates of 10-year mortality in grade III spinal ependymomas: a nationwide analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Survival Patterns and Mortality Causes in Patients with Invasive Ependymoma: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis from 2000 to 2019.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Beyond the expected: a supratentorial ependymoma imitating a meningioma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ependymomas account for approximately 5% of all CNS tumors in adults and around 10% in the pediatric population. Contrary to traditional theories supporting that ependymomas arise from ependymal cells, recent studies propose radial glial cells as the cells of origin. In adults, half of the ependymomas arise in the spinal cord, whereas in the pediatric population, almost 90% of ependymomas are located intracranially. Most of the ependymomas are usually low-grade tumors except anaplastic variants and some cases of RELA-fusion-positive ependymomas, a molecular variant consisting the most recent addition to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Of note, the recently described molecular classification of ependymomas into nine distinct subgroups appears to be of greater clinical utility and prognostic value compared to the traditional histopathological classification, and parts of it are expected to be adopted by the WHO in the near future. Clinical manifestations depend on the location of the tumor with infratentorial ependymomas presenting with acute hydrocephalus. Gross total resection should be the goal of treatment. The prognostic factors of patients with ependymomas include age, grade, and location of the tumor, with children with intracranial, anaplastic ependymomas having the worst prognosis. In general, the 5-year overall survival of patients with ependymomas is around 60-70%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.