Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452878›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

An imaging-based machine learning model outperforms clinical risk scores for prognosis of cirrhotic variceal bleeding.

Yin Gao, Qian Yu, Xiaohuan Li, Cong Xia, Jiaying Zhou, Tianyi Xia, Ben Zhao, Yue Qiu, Jun-Hao Zha, Yuancheng Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yin GaoDepartment of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Qian YuDepartment of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaohuan LiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Cong XiaDepartment of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Jiaying ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Tianyi XiaDepartment of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Ben ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Yue QiuDepartment of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Jun-Hao ZhaDepartment of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Yuancheng WangDepartment of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Tianyu TangDepartment of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Yan LvDepartment of Medical Imaging, Subei People's Hospital, Medical School of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Jing YeDepartment of Medical Imaging, Subei People's Hospital, Medical School of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Chuanjun XuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Shenghong JuDepartment of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jia Qiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China. jsh@seu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5041-7865

Funding

Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61821002Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 92059202Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81830053Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFCthe Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province BE2020717the National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFF0501504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate a machine learning model based on contrast-enhanced CT to predict the risk of occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint (hospital-based intervention or death) in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding (AVB).

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 330 cirrhotic patients with AVB between January 2017 and December 2020 from three clinical centers. Contrast-enhanced CT and clinical data were collected. Centers A and B were divided 7:3 into a training set and an internal test set, and center C served as a separate external test set. A well-trained deep learning model was applied to segment the liver and spleen. Then, we extracted 106 original features of the liver and spleen separately based on the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI). We constructed the Liver-Spleen (LS) model based on the selected radiomics features. The performance of LS model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics and calibration curves. The clinical utility of models was analyzed using decision curve analyses (DCA).

resultsThe LS model demonstrated the best diagnostic performance in predicting the composite clinical endpoint of AVB in patients with cirrhosis, with an AUC of 0.782 (95% CI 0.650-0.882) and 0.789 (95% CI 0.674-0.878) in the internal test and external test groups, respectively. Calibration curves and DCA indicated the LS model had better performance than traditional clinical scores.

conclusionA novel machine learning model outperforms previously known clinical risk scores in assessing the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with AVB CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The Liver-Spleen model based on contrast-enhanced CT has proven to be a promising tool to predict the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding, which can facilitate decision-making and personalized therapy in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • The Liver-Spleen machine learning model (LS model) showed good performance in assessing the clinical composite endpoint of cirrhotic patients with AVB (AUC ≥ 0.782, sensitivity ≥ 80%). • The LS model outperformed the clinical scores (AUC ≤ 0.730, sensitivity ≤ 70%) in both internal and external test cohorts.

Indexed as

Esophageal and Gastric VaricesGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansLiver CirrhosisMachine LearningPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsDeep learningEsophageal and gastric varicesGastrointestinal hemorrhageLiver cirrhosisMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.