ArticleJournal of sleep research2024
Continuous positive airway pressure and adherence in patients with different endotypes of obstructive sleep apnea.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rethinking Long-Term Follow-Up of CPAP Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Toward Personalized and Integrated Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optimizing CPAP Adherence in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Narrative Review of Practical Strategies for Everyday Clinical Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Beyond mean and maximum CO₂: introducing hypercapnic burden as a marker of sleep-related hypoventilation.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Research Priorities for Translating Endophenotyping of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea to the Clinic: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- The combination of physiology and machine learning for prediction of CPAP pressure and residual AHI in OSA.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Article
- Pathological respiratory chemoreflex activation predicts improvement of neurocognitive function in response to continuous positive airway pressure therapy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Novel physiologic predictors of positive airway pressure effectiveness (NICEPAP) study: rationale, design and methods.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Observational
- Positive airway pressure delivery: overcoming old hurdles, exploring new frontiers.Frontiers in sleep · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Determining the endotypes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has potential implications for precision interventions. Here we assessed whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment outcomes differ across endotypic subgroups. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data obtained from 225 patients with moderate-to-severe OSA from a single sleep centre. Polysomnographic and CPAP titration study data were collected between May 2020 and January 2022. One-month CPAP treatment adherence was followed. Obstructive sleep apnea endotypes, namely arousal threshold, collapsibility, loop gain, and upper airway gain were estimated from polysomnography and dichotomised as high versus low. We examined associations between endotypic subgroups and (1) optimal CPAP titration pressure, (2) CPAP-related improvements in sleep architecture (proportions of slow-wave and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep), and (3) CPAP adherence. We observed that patients with high collapsibility required a higher CPAP pressure than those with low collapsibility (∆ = 0.4 cmH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.