Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452683›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of medicine2023

Effects of digital-based interventions on muscular strength in adults: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials with quality of evidence assessment.

Armin Paravlic, Luka Šlosar, Ensar Abazovic, Uros Marusic

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Armin ParavlicFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-7748-8097
Luka ŠlosarScience and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-3192-9694
Ensar AbazovicFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID 0000-0001-8814-5826
Uros MarusicScience and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-7420-2137
Alma Mater Europaea · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Sarajevo · BA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the last three decades, both medical and sports science professionals have recognized the considerable potential of digital-based interventions (DBI) to enhance the health-related outcomes of their practitioners.

objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and potential moderators of DBI on measures of muscular strength.

methodsSix databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SportDiscus, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar) were searched for eligible studies up to June 2022. The GRADE, PEDRO, and TIDieR checklists were used to assess the quality of evidence, methodology, and completeness of intervention descriptions, respectively.

resultsA total of 56 studies were included in the meta-analysis (

conclusionsOverall, DBI may serve as an effective method to improve measures of strength in adults, regardless of their health status as well as the type of digital device, the presence of human-computer interaction, and the age of participants. In addition, the DBI was found to be more effective than traditional training or rehabilitation methods.KEY MESSAGESDigital-based intervention (DBI) is effective in improving measures of muscular strength in adults regardless of participants' health statusDBIs were equally effective for strength improvements in lower and upper limbsAlthough, DBIs were found to be effective in improving muscular strength, most studies did not follow strength training guidelines when prescribing the interventions.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationAdultHealth StatusHumansMuscle StrengthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCognitive trainingfrailtyneurodegenerative disordersolder adultsphysical function(registration number: CRD42022337043)strength

Identifiers

PMID37452683
PMCPMC10901531
OpenAlexW4384405821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.