Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452571›Full record

SynthesisCritical reviews in microbiology2024

Molecular imaging of bacterial biofilms-a systematic review.

S W G van Hoogstraten, C Kuik, J J C Arts, B Cillero-Pastor

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical reviews in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Biofilms: from the cradle of life to life support.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Exometabolome ofMetabolites · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S W G van HoogstratenLaboratory for Experimental Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
C KuikMaastricht MultiModal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4I), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
J J C ArtsLaboratory for Experimental Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
B Cillero-PastorMaastricht MultiModal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4I), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLEindhoven University of Technology · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation of bacterial biofilms in the human body and on medical devices is a serious human health concern. Infections related to bacterial biofilms are often chronic and difficult to treat. Detailed information on biofilm formation and composition over time is essential for a fundamental understanding of the underlying mechanisms of biofilm formation and its response to anti-biofilm therapy. However, information on the chemical composition, structural components of biofilms, and molecular interactions regarding metabolism- and communication pathways within the biofilm, such as uptake of administered drugs or inter-bacteria communication, remains elusive. Imaging these molecules and their distribution in the biofilm increases insight into biofilm development, growth, and response to environmental factors or drugs. This systematic review provides an overview of molecular imaging techniques used for bacterial biofilm imaging. The techniques included mass spectrometry-based techniques, fluorescence-labelling techniques, spectroscopic techniques, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), micro-computed tomography (µCT), and several multimodal approaches. Many molecules were imaged, such as proteins, lipids, metabolites, and quorum-sensing (QS) molecules, which are crucial in intercellular communication pathways. Advantages and disadvantages of each technique, including multimodal approaches, to study molecular processes in bacterial biofilms are discussed, and recommendations on which technique best suits specific research aims are provided.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiofilmsMolecular ImagingBacterial Physiological PhenomenaHumansQuorum Sensingbacterial biofilmmass spectrometryMolecular imagingmultimodal imagingspectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID37452571
PMCPMC11523921
OpenAlexW4384401293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.