ArticleClinical and translational science2023
Prevalence and utility of pharmacokinetic data in preclinical studies of mRNA cancer vaccines.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- AAV Gene Therapy Drug Development and Translation of Engineered Ocular and Neurotropic Capsids: A Systematic Review Using Natural Language Processing.Clinical and translational science · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence and utility of pharmacokinetic data in preclinical studies of mRNA cancer vaccines.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this brief report, we provide insights into current practices in preclinical messenger RNA (mRNA) cancer vaccine characterization. To enable a more automated and thorough survey of mRNA cancer vaccine data in the literature, we implemented natural language processing to mine abstracts from PubMed followed by annotation of the selected articles. Through this analysis we identified a gap in the literature wherein pharmacokinetic (PK) characterization is not reported in mRNA cancer vaccine-focused articles. As a result, the field is unable to evaluate and discuss cross-study PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships nor the translation of these relationships from preclinical species to humans. As the field of mRNA cancer vaccines is rapidly evolving, there is value in expanding our understanding of preclinical PK/PD relationships and how they relate to PK/PD in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.