Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452427›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2023

The Rapid interaction: a qualitative study of provider approaches to implementing Rapid ART.

Lissa Moran, Kimberly A Koester, Noelle Le Tourneau, Susa Coffey, Kelvin Moore, Janessa Broussard, Pierre-Cedric Crouch, Lyndon VanderZanden, John Schneider, Elizabeth Lynch and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effective Messages to Reduce Stigma among People Newly Diagnosed with HIV during Rapid ART Initiation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lissa MoranDepartment of Medicine, University of California, 550 16Th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA. lissa.moran@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2026-6095
Kimberly A KoesterDepartment of Medicine, University of California, 550 16Th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Noelle Le TourneauDepartment of Medicine, University of California, 550 16Th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Susa CoffeyDepartment of Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kelvin MooreDepartment of Medicine, University of California, 550 16Th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Janessa BroussardDepartment of Community Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of California, 2 Koret Way, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Pierre-Cedric CrouchDepartment of Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lyndon VanderZandenHoward Brown Health Center, 4025 N. Sheridan Rd, Chicago, IL, USA.
John SchneiderDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Street, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elizabeth LynchDepartment of Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jorge RomanSan Francisco AIDS Foundation, 470 Castro Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Katerina A ChristopoulosDepartment of Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
San Francisco General Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USHoward Brown Health Center · USSan Francisco AIDS Foundation · USUnity Health System · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Sheri Ann Lippman · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
California HIV/AIDS Research Program OS17-SF-004NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOffering antiretroviral therapy (ART) to patients directly following an HIV diagnosis ("Rapid ART") improves clinical outcomes and is feasible and acceptable for patients and providers. Despite this, implementation of Rapid ART is not yet standard practice in the USA. Structural-level implementation guidance is available, but research at the individual provider level that explores the patient-provider interaction itself remains scarce. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) provides a nuanced guide to investigating the less visible, more social elements of implementation like the knowledge and feelings of people, and the influences of culture and resources on individual approaches.

methodsWe conducted a multi-site qualitative study, exploring intervention commonalities across three HIV clinic environments: an HIV primary care clinic; an HIV/STI testing, treatment, and prevention clinic; and a large federally qualified health center (FQHC). Qualitative data were gathered from 27 provider informants-Rapid ART program staff and clinicians-using an interview guide developed using the CFIR. An experienced qualitative team conducted a comprehensive thematic analysis and identified cross-cutting themes in how providers approach and engage in the Rapid interaction, as well as longer-form narratives from providers that describe more fully what this interaction looks like for them.

resultsThree main themes represent the range and content of individual provider approaches to the Rapid interaction: (1) patient-centeredness; (2) emotional support and partnership; and (3) correcting misperceptions about HIV. Each theme encompassed both conceptual approaches to offering Rapid ART and concrete examples of messaging to the patient that providers used in the Rapid interaction. We describe and show examples of these themes, offer key take-aways for implementation, and provide expanded narratives of providers' personal approaches to the Rapid interaction.

conclusionsExploration of provider-level approaches to Rapid ART implementation, as carried out in the patient-provider Rapid interaction, contributes a critical layer of evidence for wider implementation. It is our hope that, together with existing research showing positive outcomes and core components of systems-level implementation, these findings add to an instructive body of findings that facilitates the implementation of Rapid ART as an enhanced model of HIV care.

Indexed as

CFIRIndividual-level implementationPatient-provider interactionProvider messagingProvider narrativesRapid ARTSame-day start

Identifiers

PMID37452427
PMCPMC10349523
OpenAlexW4384298153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.