Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452378›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and biotechnology2023

Trends in in ovo sexing technologies: insights and interpretation from papers and patents.

Matthias Corion, Simão Santos, Bart De Ketelaere, Dragana Spasic, Maarten Hertog, Jeroen Lammertyn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Eye pigmentation-based in-ovo chicken sexing via precision breeding.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthias Corion *KU Leuven, BIOSYST-MeBioS Biosensors Group, Willem de Croylaan 42, Leuven, B-3001, Belgium.
Simão Santos *KU Leuven, BIOSYST-MeBioS Biosensors Group, Willem de Croylaan 42, Leuven, B-3001, Belgium.
Bart De KetelaereKU Leuven, BIOSYST-MeBioS Biostatistics Group, Kasteelpark Arenberg 30, Leuven, B-3001, Belgium. bart.deketelaere@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-1643
Dragana SpasicKU Leuven, BIOSYST-MeBioS Biosensors Group, Willem de Croylaan 42, Leuven, B-3001, Belgium.
Maarten HertogKU Leuven, BIOSYST-MeBioS Postharvest Group, Willem de Croylaan 42, Leuven, B-3001, Belgium.
Jeroen LammertynKU Leuven, BIOSYST-MeBioS Biosensors Group, Willem de Croylaan 42, Leuven, B-3001, Belgium.

Funding

Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research EggTech-0000000028Research Foundation - Flanders (BE) SB project 1S54823NResearch Foundation - Flanders (BE) SB project 1SC7219N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous researchers and institutions have been developing in ovo sexing technologies to improve animal welfare by identifying male embryos in an early embryonic stage and disposing of them before pain perception. This review gives a complete overview of the technological approaches reported in papers and patents by performing a thorough search using Web of Science and Patstat/Espacenet databases for papers and patents, respectively. Based on a total of 49 papers and 115 patent families reported until May 2023 worldwide, 11 technology categories were defined: 6 non-optical and 5 optical techniques. Every category was described for its characteristics while assessing its potential for application. Next, the dynamics of the publications of in ovo sexing techniques in both paper and patent fields were described through growth curves, and the interest or actual status was visualized using the number of paper citations and the actual legal status of the patents. When comparing the reported technologies in papers to those in patents, scientific gaps were observed, as some of the patented technologies were not reported in the scientific literature, e.g., ion mobility and mass spectrometry approaches. Generally, more diverse approaches in all categories were found in patents, although they do require more scientific evidence through papers or industrial adoption to prove their robustness. Moreover, although there is a recent trend for non-invasive techniques, invasive methods like analyzing DNA through PCR or hormones through immunosensing are still being reported (and might continue to be) in papers and patents. It was also observed that none of the technologies complies with all the industry requirements, although 5 companies already entered the market. On the one hand, more research and harmony between consumers, industry, and governments is necessary. On the other hand, close monitoring of the market performance of the currently available techniques will offer valuable insights into the potential and expectations of in ovo sexing techniques in the poultry industry.

Indexed as

Animal welfareIn ovo sexingMale day-old chick cullingOptical and non-optical techniquesPatents and papers

Identifiers

PMID37452378
PMCPMC10347793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.