Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452340›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2023

Winnipeg-based elementary school teachers' perspectives on food allergy management: a qualitative analysis.

Mae Jhelene L Santos, Kaitlyn Merrill, Natalie Riediger, Elissa M Abrams, Nathalie Piquemal, Elinor Simons, Jennifer L P Protudjer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mae Jhelene L SantosDepartment of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Kaitlyn MerrillChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Natalie RiedigerDepartment of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Elissa M AbramsDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Nathalie PiquemalFaculty of Education, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Elinor SimonsDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Jennifer L P ProtudjerDepartment of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. Jennifer.Protudjer@umanitoba.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3888-8688
Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CAKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

CIHR MRC 422574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood allergy affects 7-8% of children worldwide. Teachers supervise children in school, where most children spend their day. Yet, teachers have variable food allergy-related knowledge.

objectiveWe aimed to identify how Winnipeg-based elementary school teachers manage food allergy and prevent food-triggered allergic reactions in their classrooms and schools.

methodsKindergarten-Grade 6 public and private school teachers, from Winnipeg, Canada, were interviewed virtually upon providing written informed consent. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The study followed a pragmatic framework. Data were analysed via thematic analysis by multiple researchers.

resultsWe interviewed 16 teachers, who primarily identified as female (87.5%). Most teachers worked in public schools (87.5%) and, on average, had 5.8 years of teaching experience. We identified four themes within the data. Most teachers (68.9%) had direct or indirect experience with food allergy. Theme 1 described the minimal standardization and inconsistent enforcement of food allergy policies between and within schools. Teachers also had varied food allergy knowledge. Theme 2 reflected teachers' variable confidence/perceived knowledge towards food allergy management, including feeling of stress and anxiety. Theme 3 captured the lack of standardized food allergy education for teachers, and concerns about the adequacy of the current provincial program. Theme 4 described how teachers spoke of relying on other school staff, families and students to have effective communication.

conclusionTeachers' food allergy management was informed by their knowledge and lived experience, guided by their school policies and individualized students' needs. Teachers identified gaps in knowledge and communication, and desired more training and resources.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisElementary schoolEpinephrineFood allergyFood allergy managementInterviewsQualitative studyTeachers

Identifiers

PMID37452340
PMCPMC10347816
OpenAlexW4384343089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.