Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452268›Full record

ArticleBiological trace element research2024

Human Health Risk Assessment due to the Incidence of Heavy Metals in Different Commercial Feeds Used for the Culturing of Biofloc Fish (Nile tilapia: Oreochromis niloticus).

Mahvish Jabeen Channa, Huma Ayub, Javed Ahmed Ujan, Syed Sikandar Habib, Mujeeb Ullah, Sobia Attaullah, Khayyam Khayyam, Khalid Khan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological trace element research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mahvish Jabeen ChannaInstitute of Biochemistry, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, 76080, Sindh, Pakistan.
Huma AyubDepartment of Zoology, Mirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mirpur, 10250, AJK, Pakistan.
Javed Ahmed UjanDepartment of Zoology, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, 66111, Sindh, Pakistan.
Syed Sikandar HabibDepartment of Zoology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, 40100, Punjab, Pakistan. sikandarzoo00@yahoo.com.
Mujeeb UllahDepartment of Zoology, Islamia College University, Peshawar, 25120, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Sobia AttaullahDepartment of Zoology, Islamia College University, Peshawar, 25120, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Khayyam KhayyamDepartment of Zoology, Islamia College University, Peshawar, 25120, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Khalid KhanDepartment of Zoology, Islamia College University, Peshawar, 25120, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Islamia College University · PKMirpur University of Science and Technology · PKShah Abdul Latif University · PKUniversity of Sargodha · PKUniversity of Sindh · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish meat is a major and rich source of white protein; its quality is determined by the fish feed. However, the low-quality feed may contribute to a source of contamination if it does not fulfill the standard protocol. Biofloc is considered one of the most efficient, successful aquacultures, but this system is still under investigation for its efficiency and safety. Thus, current study focused on the heavy metal contamination in biofloc fish fed on different commercial feeds and human health risk analysis. Samples of extensively used three feeds (Supreme™, Hitech™, and MH-Aqua™), tanks water, and biofloc fish (gills, liver muscle) were collected for heavy metals (Cu, Cd, Pb, and Cr) analysis using atomic absorption spectrometry. An experiment was designed by dividing the fish into three groups: group 1 (Supreme™), group 2 (Hitech™), and group 3 (MH-Aqua™). A bioaccumulation factor and human health risk assessment have been calculated to measure fish and human health. Results revealed that most of the heavy metal concentration was higher (P < 0.05) in MH-Aqua™ feed compared to others. Similarly, heavy metal concentration was higher (P < 0.05) in the water of group 3, where fish was cultured on MH-Aqua™ feed. However, in the fish gills, liver, and muscle, the heavy metal concentration was significantly greater in group 3 fed on MH-Aqua™ feed, followed by group 1. Heavy metals in all feeds were positively correlated to the heavy metal concentration of the fish muscles. The bioaccumulation factor for Cu and Pb was higher in the fish liver, Cd and Cr in the case of fish gills, and least in the fish muscle. EDI and THQ values vary in all the groups, while the HI value was found lower than 1 in group 1 and group 2 but higher in group 3 fed on MH-Aqua™ feed. Strict checks and balances in formulating a diet will be helpful to progressively lower the amount of dangerous heavy metals.

Indexed as

CichlidsMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsAquacultureCadmiumEnvironmental MonitoringHumansIncidenceLeadRisk AssessmentWaterCadmiumLeadMetals, HeavyWaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalBioaccumulationBiofloc technologyCommonly used fish feedHazard indexHeavy metal pollutionOreochromis niloticus

Identifiers

PMID37452268
OpenAlexW4384281975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.