Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452229›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2023

Detour test performance of cloned minipigs from three different clone populations.

Aurora Paganelli, Martina Felici, Luca Turini, Paolo Baragli, Lucia Carlucci, Fabio Anastasio Recchia, Micaela Sgorbini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aurora PaganelliInstitute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33, Pisa, 56127, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5112-9786
Martina FeliciDepartment of Agricultural and Food Science, Viale Giuseppe Fanin, 40-50, Bologna, 40127, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6797-1659
Luca TuriniDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Via del Borghetto 80, Pisa, 56124, Italy. luca.turini@unipi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4164-8263
Paolo BaragliDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Viale delle Piagge 2, Pisa, 56122, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5221-5714
Lucia CarlucciInstitute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33, Pisa, 56127, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5856-5280
Fabio Anastasio RecchiaInstitute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33, Pisa, 56127, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4189-8465
Micaela SgorbiniDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Viale delle Piagge 2, Pisa, 56122, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0294-1803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetics, the uterine environment, maternal behavior, and rearing conditions can all influence animal behavioral phenotypes. Some studies on cloned pigs have found no differences between the behavioral patterns of cloned and non-cloned animals. Other studies conducted on dogs have reported similarities in the behavior of cloned subjects. This study evaluated the performance of 12 cloned minipigs from three different clone populations (A, B, C) in a detour test around symmetric and asymmetric barriers. We measured the detour time and patterns, in order to investigate the pigs' cognitive abilities.The detour time and the detour entry/exit pattern were recorded. All the animals tended to keep a fixed entry/exit pattern instead of modifying it to accommodate changes in the working set. Significant differences in detour time were found among the populations, with animals belonging to population B being faster than the others, and also within each population.Our study is one of the few to assess the cognitive abilities of cloned minipigs. The results indicate that even animals belonging to the same cloned population may develop different cognitive, hence behavioral characteristics. Whether cloning can be utilized to obtain similar behavioral phenotypes therefore remains a matter of debate.

Indexed as

Swine, MiniatureAnimalsDogsFemaleHumansSwineAnimal behaviorCloneDetour testMinipig

Identifiers

PMID37452229
PMCPMC10698088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.