Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452167›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2023

Speed limits: the effects of industrial food processing and food texture on daily energy intake and eating behaviour in healthy adults.

Marlou Lasschuijt, Guido Camps, Monica Mars, Els Siebelink, Kees de Graaf, Dieuwerke Bolhuis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04280146 (Speed Limits), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04280146 naunknown statusnot on this map

Speed Limits: Food Intake and Eating Behaviour of Ultra-processed and Unprocessed Foods

TypeinterventionalSponsorWageningen UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled60ConditionsObesity, Excess CaloriesArmsdaily energy intake
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The role of ultra-processed food in obesity.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marlou LasschuijtDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands. marlou.lasschuijt@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1279-6742
Guido CampsDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Monica MarsDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Els SiebelinkDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Kees de GraafDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Dieuwerke BolhuisFood Quality and Design Group, Wageningen University & Research, Bornse Weilanden 9, 6708 WG, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

4TU prejudice project4TU Pride
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFrequent consumption of industrially processed foods has been associated with obesity. However, it is unknown what drives this association. Food textures of industrially processed foods that stimulate energy overconsumption may be an important driver of this association. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the independent and combined effects of food texture and level of industrial food processing (based on the NOVA classification) on daily energy intake and eating behaviour.

methodsEighteen healthy adults (F/M: 11/7, 23 ± 3 y, 22.1 ± 2.0 kg/m

resultsDaily energy intake and food intake were, respectively, 33% (571 ± 135 kcal) and 14% (247 ± 146 g) lower in the hard compared to the soft conditions (main texture p < 0.001). Energy intake was lower in both hard conditions compared to the (ultra)processed soft condition (Tukey p < 0.04). Eating rate (g/min) was on average 85% slower (P < 0.001) in the hard compared to the soft conditions (p < 0.001). Level of processing did not affect food intake.

conclusionConsumption of hard-textured foods reduces daily energy intake of (ultra-) processed foods. This preliminary investigation shows that there is great variability in food properties that affect energy and food intake beyond industrial food processing. However, findings should be interpreted with precaution considering the limited sample size of this trial. Future classification systems for public health messaging should include energy intake rate to help reduce overconsumption. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: NCT04280146, https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov , February 21st 2020.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeFeeding BehaviorAdultDietFast FoodsFood HandlingHumansMealsDietEnergy intake rateFood intakeFood textureIndustrial processingNOVA

Identifiers

PMID37452167
PMCPMC10469122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.