Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452152›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2023

Who Places Feeding Tubes and in What Scenario?

Apeksha Shah, Rebecca A Busch, Erica Knavel Koepsel, Mohamed Eisa, Michael Woods, Sonali Palchaudhuri

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Apeksha ShahDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cooper University Healthcare, Camden, NJ, USA. shah-apeksha@cooperhealth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0116-152X
Rebecca A BuschDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Erica Knavel KoepselDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Mohamed EisaAllegheny Center for Digestive Health, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michael WoodsDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Sonali PalchaudhuriDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewEnteral feeding is commonly used to provide patients with nutrition. Access via feeding tubes can be attained by multiple medical specialties through a variety of methods. RECENT

findingsThere are limited data available on direct comparisons amongst gastroenterologist, interventional radiologists and surgeons, although there appears to be similar rates of complications. Fluroscopically and surgically placed feeding tubes may have a higher technical success rate than endoscopically placed tubes. The preferred specialty for feeding tube placement varies per institution, often due to logistical matters over technique or concern for complications. Ideally, a multidisciplinary team should exist to determine which approach is best in a patient-specific manner.

Indexed as

GastrostomyJejunostomyEnteral NutritionHumansIntubation, GastrointestinalEnteral nutritionFeeding tubeGastrostomyJejunostomy

Identifiers

PMID37452152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.