Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452150›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2023

Effect of preprocessing and simulation parameters on the performance of molecular docking studies.

Pedro Henrique Callil-Soares, Lilian Caroline Kramer Biasi, Pedro de Alcântara Pessoa Filho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pedro Henrique Callil-Soares *Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, Av. Lineu Prestes, 580, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil.
Lilian Caroline Kramer Biasi *Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, Av. Lineu Prestes, 580, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil. lckbiasi@usp.br.
Pedro de Alcântara Pessoa Filho *Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, Av. Lineu Prestes, 580, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 305747/2020-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2014/21252-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMolecular docking is an important and rapid tool that provides a comprehensive view of different molecular mechanisms. It is often used to verify the binding interactions of many pairs of molecules and is much faster than more rigorous approaches. However, its application requires carefully preprocessing each molecule and selecting a series of simulation parameters, which is not always done correctly. We show how preprocessing and simulation parameters can positively or negatively impact molecular docking performance. For example, the inclusion of hydrogen atoms leads to better redocking scores, but molecular dynamics simulations must be performed under certain constraints; otherwise, it may worsen performance rather than improve it. This study clarifies the importance and influence of these different parameters in the simulation results.

methodsWe analyzed the influence of different parameters on the predictive ability of molecular docking techniques using two software packages: AutoDock Vina and AutoDock-GPU. Thus, 90 receptor-ligand complexes were redocked, evaluating the root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the original position of the ligand (receptor-ligand complex obtained experimentally) and that obtained by the software for every analysis. We investigated the influence of hydrogen atoms (on the receptor and on the receptor-ligand complex), partial charges (QEq, QTPIE, EEM, EEM2015ha, MMFF94, Gasteiger-Marsili, and no charge), search boxes (size and exhaustiveness), ligand characteristics (size and number of torsions), and the use of molecular dynamics (of the receptor or the receptor-ligand complex) before docking analyses.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationSoftwareLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingLigandsComputational chemistryDrug designMolecular dockingMolecular dynamicsSimulation parameters

Identifiers

PMID37452150
OpenAlexW4384401378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.