Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37452115›Full record

Observational studyJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2023

Shift-to-shift handoffs in the NICU: lessons learned from a large scale audit.

Heather C Kaplan, Wendy Timpson, Jeffrey Meyers, Elizabeth Schierholz, Howard Cohen, Marybeth Fry, Denise Zayack, Roger F Soll, Kate A Morrow, Erika M Edwards

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Heather C KaplanPerinatal Institute, James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. heather.kaplan@cchmc.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0487-2781
Wendy TimpsonDivision of Neonatology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Jeffrey MeyersDivision of Neonatology, Golisano Children's Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Elizabeth SchierholzChildren's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Howard CohenRandall Children's Hospital, Portland, OR, USA.
Marybeth FryAkron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH, USA.
Denise ZayackVermont Oxford Network, Burlington, VT, USA.
Roger F SollVermont Oxford Network, Burlington, VT, USA.
Kate A MorrowVermont Oxford Network, Burlington, VT, USA.
Erika M EdwardsVermont Oxford Network, Burlington, VT, USA.
University of Vermont · USVermont Oxford Network · USAkron Children's Hospital · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USRandall Children's Hospital at Legacy Emanuel · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDescribe the frequency of best practice behaviors during NICU provider and nursing shift-to-shift handoffs and identify strengths and opportunities for improvement. STUDY

designObservational study of handoff characteristics among 40 centers participating in a learning collaborative over a 10-month period. Data were gathered using a handoff audit tool that outlined best practices. Comparisons of behaviors between nurse-to-nurse and provider-to-provider handoffs were made where appropriate.

resultsOverall, 946 audits of shift-to-shift handoffs were analyzed. While many behaviors were demonstrated reliably, differences between nurse-to-nurse vs provider-to-provider handoffs were noted. Families were present for 5.9% of handoffs and, among those who were present, 48.2% participated by contributing information, asking questions, and sharing goals.

conclusionsObservation and measurement of handoff behaviors can be used to identify opportunities to improve handoff communication, family participation, and human factors that support handoff. Auditing handoffs is feasible and necessary to improve these critical transitions in infants' care.

Indexed as

Patient HandoffHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, Neonatal

Identifiers

PMID37452115
OpenAlexW4384298940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.