ArticleScientific reports2023
Time series causal relationships discovery through feature importance and ensemble models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exposure to air and water pollution during pregnancy and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in São Paulo State: protocol for a retrospective population-based cohort study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Causality-driven feature representation for connectivity prediction.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Robust inference of causality in high-dimensional dynamical processes from the Information Imbalance of distance ranks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inferring causal relationships from observational data is a key challenge in understanding the interpretability of Machine Learning models. Given the ever-increasing amount of observational data available in many areas, Machine Learning algorithms used for forecasting have become more complex, leading to a less understandable path of how a decision is made by the model. To address this issue, we propose leveraging ensemble models, e.g., Random Forest, to assess which input features the trained model prioritizes when making a forecast and, in this way, establish causal relationships between the variables. The advantage of these algorithms lies in their ability to provide feature importance, which allows us to build the causal network. We present our methodology to estimate causality in time series from oil field production. As it is difficult to extract causal relations from a real field, we also included a synthetic oil production dataset and a weather dataset, which is also synthetic, to provide the ground truth. We aim to perform causal discovery, i.e., establish the existing connections between the variables in each dataset. Through an iterative process of improving the forecasting of a target's value, we evaluate whether the forecasting improves by adding information from a new potential driver; if so, we state that the driver causally affects the target. On the oil field-related datasets, our causal analysis results agree with the interwell connections already confirmed by tracer information; whenever the tracer data are available, we used it as our ground truth. This consistency between both estimated and confirmed connections provides us the confidence about the effectiveness of our proposed methodology. To our knowledge, this is the first time causal analysis using solely production data is employed to discover interwell connections in an oil field dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.