Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37451826›Full record

ReviewRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2024

Local anesthetic dosing and toxicity of adult truncal catheters: a narrative review of published practice.

Brittani Bungart, Lana Joudeh, Michael Fettiplace

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Local anesthetic dosing for fascial plane blocks to avoid systemic toxicity: a narrative review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025
    Review
  11. Impact of temperature on ECFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brittani Bungart *Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5705-3742
Lana Joudeh *Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael FettiplaceDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA fettiplace@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6946-8355
Harvard University · US

Funding

Research Training for AnesthetistsT32GM007592 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STUART A FORMAN · 1985 to 2026
$11.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/importanceAnesthesiologists frequently use truncal catheters for postoperative pain control but with limited characterization of dosing and toxicity.

objectiveWe reviewed the published literature to characterize local anesthetic dosing and toxicity of paravertebral and transversus abdominis plane catheters in adults. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We searched the literature for bupivacaine or ropivacaine infusions in the paravertebral or transversus abdominis space in humans dosed for 24 hours. We evaluated bolus dosing, infusion dosing and cumulative 24-hour dosing in adults. We also identified cases of local anesthetic systemic toxicity and toxic blood levels.

findingsFollowing screening, we extracted data from 121 and 108 papers for ropivacaine and bupivacaine respectively with a total of 6802 patients. For ropivacaine and bupivacaine, respectively, bolus dose was 1.4 mg/kg (95% CI 0.4 to 3.0, n=2978) and 1.0 mg/kg (95% CI 0.18 to 2.1, n=2724); infusion dose was 0.26 mg/kg/hour (95% CI 0.06 to 0.63, n=3579) and 0.2 mg/kg/hour (95% CI 0.06 to 0.5, n=3199); 24-hour dose was 7.75 mg/kg (95% CI 2.1 to 15.7, n=3579) and 6.0 mg/kg (95% CI 2.1 to 13.6, n=3223). Twenty-four hour doses exceeded the package insert recommended upper limit in 28% (range: 17%-40% based on maximum and minimum patient weights) of ropivacaine infusions and 51% (range: 45%-71%) of bupivacaine infusions. Toxicity occurred in 30 patients and was associated with high 24-hour dose, bilateral catheters, cardiac surgery, cytochrome P-450 inhibitors and hypoalbuminemia.

conclusionPractitioners frequently administer ropivacaine and bupivacaine above the package insert limits, at doses associated with toxicity. Patient safety would benefit from more specific recommendations to limit excessive dose and risk of toxicity.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalNerve BlockAdultAmidesBupivacaineCathetersHumansPostoperative PainRopivacaineAmidesAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineRopivacaineDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsNerve BlockPain, PostoperativePostoperative ComplicationsREGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Identifiers

PMID37451826
PMCPMC10787820
OpenAlexW4384342665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.