Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37451734›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2023

Motor and autonomic concomitant health improvements with neuromodulation and exercise (MACHINE) training: a randomised controlled trial in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Claire Shackleton, Soshi Samejima, Alison Mm Williams, Raza N Malik, Shane Jt Balthazaar, Abdullah Alrashidi, Rahul Sachdeva, Stacy L Elliott, Thomas E Nightingale, Michael J Berger and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04726059 (Motor and Autonomic Concomitant Health Improvements With Neuromodulation and Exercise), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04726059 naunknown statusnot on this map

Motor and Autonomic Concomitant Health Improvements With Neuromodulation and Exercise (MACHINE) Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Individuals With SCI

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled12ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Neurogenic Bladder, Neurogenic BowelArmsTranscutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation, SHAM (low-intensity) Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation, Activity-Based Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Claire ShackletonInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5042-1490
Soshi SamejimaInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3796-8085
Alison Mm WilliamsInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Raza N MalikInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Shane Jt BalthazaarInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Abdullah AlrashidiInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Rahul SachdevaInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Stacy L ElliottInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Thomas E NightingaleInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michael J BergerInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tania LamInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada andrei.krassioukov@vch.ca tania.lam@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5782-2537
Andrei V KrassioukovInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada andrei.krassioukov@vch.ca tania.lam@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0022-7972
University of British Columbia · CAVancouver Coastal Health · CA

Funding

CIHR AWD-024871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMotor and autonomic dysfunctions are widespread among people with spinal cord injury (SCI), leading to poor health and reduced quality of life. Exercise interventions, such as locomotor training (LT), can promote sensorimotor and autonomic recovery post SCI. Recently, breakthroughs in SCI research have reported beneficial effects of electrical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on motor and autonomic functions. Despite literature supporting the independent benefits of transcutaneous SCS (TSCS) and LT, the effect of pairing TSCS with LT is unknown. These therapies are non-invasive, customisable and have the potential to simultaneously benefit both sensorimotor and autonomic functions. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of LT paired with TSCS in people with chronic SCI on outcomes of sensorimotor and autonomic function. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Twelve eligible participants with chronic (>1 year) motor-complete SCI, at or above the sixth thoracic segment, will be enrolled in this single-blinded, randomised sham-controlled trial. Participants will undergo mapping for optimisation of stimulation parameters and baseline assessments of motor and autonomic functions. Participants will then be randomly assigned to either LT+TSCS or LT+Sham stimulation for 12 weeks, after which postintervention assessments will be performed to determine the effect of TSCS on motor and autonomic functions. The primary outcome of interest is attempted voluntary muscle activation using surface electromyography. The secondary outcomes relate to sensorimotor function, cardiovascular function, pelvic organ function and health-related quality of life. Statistical analysis will be performed using two-way repeated measures Analysis of variance (ANOVAs) or Kruskal-Wallis and Cohen's effect sizes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved after full ethical review by the University of British Columbia's Research Ethics Board. The stimulator used in this trial has received Investigation Testing Authorisation from Health Canada. Trial results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and seminars. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04726059.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSpinal Cord InjuriesExerciseHumansMuscle, SkeletalPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSpinal Cordblood pressureclinical trialsneurological injuryphysical therapy modalitiesquality of liferehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID37451734
PMCPMC10351300
OpenAlexW4384344072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.