Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37451724›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Newcastle 1000 (NEW1000) Study: an Australian population-based prospective pregnancy cohort study design and protocol.

Tegan Grace, Joshua Fisher, Carol Wang, Sarah R Valkenborghs, Roger Smith, Jonathan J Hirst, Joerg Mattes, Vanessa E Murphy, Craig E Pennell, NEW1000 Study Executive Committee and Research Leadership

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tegan GraceSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia tegan.grace@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4208-0435
Joshua FisherSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Carol WangSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah R ValkenborghsSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2259-4682
Roger SmithSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Jonathan J HirstMothers and Babies Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Joerg MattesSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3729-5722
Vanessa E MurphySchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3282-1324
Craig E PennellSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0937-6165
NEW1000 Study Executive Committee and Research Leadership
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMultiple cohort studies have been established to investigate the impact of early life factors on development and health outcomes. In Australia the majority of these studies were established more than 20 years ago and, although longitudinal in nature, are inherently susceptible to socioeconomic, environmental and cultural influences which change over time. Additionally, rapid leaps in technology have increased our understanding of the complex role of gene-environment interactions in life course health, highlighting the need for new cohort studies with repeated biological sampling and in-depth phenotype data across the first 1000 days of life from conception. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Newcastle 1000 (NEW1000) Study, based in the regional city of Newcastle, New South Wales, was developed after an extensive consultation process involving 3 years of discussion with key stakeholders and healthcare consumer organisations and seven healthcare consumer workshops. This prospective population-based pregnancy cohort study will recruit 500 families per year for 5 years, providing detailed, longitudinal, multisystem phenotyping, repeated ultrasound measures and serial sample collection to investigate healthcare consumer identified health outcomes of priority. Stage 1 will involve recruitment of pregnant participants and their partners at 14 weeks gestation, with dense phenotype data and biological samples collected at 14, 20, 28 and 36 weeks gestation and serial ultrasound measures at 20, 28, 36 and 40 weeks, with postpartum follow-up at 6 weeks and 6 months. Biological samples will be used for biomarker discovery and sequencing of the genome, transcriptome, epigenome, microbiome and metabolome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from Hunter New England Local Health District Ethics Committee (2020/ETH02881). Outcomes will be published in peer-reviewed journals, disseminated to participants through the NEW1000 website, presented at scientific conferences, and written reports to local, state and national government bodies and key stakeholders in the healthcare system to inform policy and evidence-based practice.

Indexed as

Research DesignAustraliaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansNew South WalesPregnancyProspective StudiesChild DevelopmentDevelopmental Origins of Health and DiseaseDOHaDFamily Cohort StudyPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37451724
PMCPMC10351266
OpenAlexW4384344111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.