Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37451701›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open respiratory research2023

Bisoprolol versus celiprolol on dynamic hyperinflation, cardiopulmonary exercise and domiciliary safety in COPD: a single-centre, randomised, crossover study.

William Anderson, Philip Short, Rose Ross, Brian J Lipworth

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open respiratory research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02380053 (Proof of Concept Study to Assess the Differential Effects of Chronic Beta-blockade), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02380053 phase4completednot on this map

Proof of Concept Study to Assess the Differential Effects of Chronic Beta-blockade (Celiprolol Versus Bisoprolol) on Cardiopulmonary Outcomes at Rest and During Exercise in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of DundeeRan2016 to 2019Enrolled10ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsBisoprolol, Celiprolol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William AndersonDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK w.j.anderson@dundee.ac.uk.
Philip ShortDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.
Rose RossDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.
Brian J LipworthScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
NHS Tayside · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently associated with cardiovascular disease. The utility of beta-blockers for treating patients with COPD may be beneficial, but their safety remains uncertain, including worsening of dynamic hyperinflation (DH) during exercise. We hypothesised that among cardioselective beta-blockers celiprolol, due to its partial beta-2 agonist activity, may be safer than bisoprolol on exercise DH.

methodsWe measured isotime inspiratory capacity (IC) during cycle endurance testing in eleven moderate-severe COPD subjects, alongside other non-invasive cardiopulmonary exercise, bioreactance cardiac output, pulmonary function, biomarkers and daily domiciliary measures. Participants received titrated doses of either bisoprolol (maximim 5 mg) or celiprolol (maximum 400 mg) in randomised crossover fashion, each over 4 weeks.

resultsClinically relevant DH occurred between resting and exercise isotime IC but showed no significant difference with either beta-blocker compared with post-run-in pooled baseline or between treatments. There were no other significant differences observed for remaining exercise ventilatory; non-invasive cardiac output; resting pulmonary function; beta-2 receptor and cardiac biomarkers; domiciliary pulmonary function, oxygen saturation and symptom outcomes, either between treatments or compared with baseline. No significant adverse effects occurred.

conclusionsSignificant DH in moderate-severe COPD subjects was no different between bisoprolol or celiprolol or versus baseline. A broad spectrum of other non-invasive cardiopulmonary and domiciliary safety outcomes was equally reassuring. Bronchoprotection with a concomitant long-acting muscarinic antagonist might be an important safety measure in this context. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02380053.

Indexed as

BisoprololPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCeliprololCross-Over StudiesExercise ToleranceHumansBisoprololCeliprololCOPD PharmacologyExercisePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory Measurement

Identifiers

PMID37451701
PMCPMC10351271
OpenAlexW4384343857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.