Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37451690›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2023

Prospective evaluation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in a Norwegian cohort of patients with suspected or advanced ovarian cancer.

Kristina Lindemann, Andreas Kleppe, Brynhildur Eyjólfsdóttir, Svana Heimisdottir Danbolt, Yun Yong Wang, Anne Gjertine Heli-Haugestøl, Sara L Walcott, Odd Mjåland, Gerd-Anita Navestad, Silje Hermanrud and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. SEX AND ASA CLASSIFICATION, NOT FASTING TIME, ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE LIKELIHOOD OF COMPLICATIONS IN THE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Patient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kristina LindemannDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway klinde@ous-hf.no.ORCID 0000-0002-2162-0175
Andreas KleppeInstitute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8370-5289
Brynhildur EyjólfsdóttirDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Svana Heimisdottir DanboltDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Yun Yong WangDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Gjertine Heli-HaugestølDepartment of Clinical Service, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Sara L WalcottDepartment of Clinical Service, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Odd MjålandDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Gerd-Anita NavestadDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Silje HermanrudDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Knut Erling Juul-HansenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo, Norway.
Ulf KongsgaardFaculty of Medicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis prospective cohort study evaluated the introduction of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in a tertiary gynecologic oncology referral center. Compliance and clinical outcomes were studied in two separate surgical cohorts.

methodsPatients undergoing laparotomy for suspected or verified advanced ovarian cancer at Oslo University Hospital were prospectively included in a pre- and post-implementation cohort. A priori, patients were stratified into: cohort 1, patients planned for surgery of advanced disease; and cohort 2, patients undergoing surgery for suspicious pelvic tumor. Baseline characteristics, adherence to the pathway, and clinical outcomes were assessed.

resultsOf the 439 included patients, 235 (54%) underwent surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in cohort 1 and 204 (46%) in cohort 2. In cohort 1, 53% of the patients underwent surgery with an intermediate/high Aletti complexity score. Post-ERAS, median fasting times for solids (13.1 hours post-ERAS vs 16.0 hours pre-ERAS, p<0.001) and fluids (3.7 hours post-ERAS vs 11.0 hours pre-ERAS, p<0.001) were significantly reduced. Peri-operative fluid management varied less and was reduced from median 15.8 mL/kg/hour (IQR 10.8-22.5) to 11.5 mL/kg/hour (IQR 9.0-15.4) (p<0.001). In cohort 2 only there was a statistically significant reduction in length of stay (mean (SD) 4.3±1.5 post-ERAS vs 4.6±1.2 pre-ERAS, p=0.026). Despite stable readmission rates, there were significantly more serious complications reported in cohort 1 post-ERAS.

conclusionsERAS increased adherence to current standards in peri-operative management with significant reduction in fasting times for both solids and fluids, and peri-operative fluid administration. Length of stay was reduced in patients with suspicious pelvic tumor. Despite serious complications being common in patients with advanced disease undergoing debulking surgery, a causal relationship with the ERAS protocol could not be established. Implementing ERAS and continuous performance auditing are crucial to advancing peri-operative care of patients with ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryOvarian NeoplasmsPelvic NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesGynecologic Surgical ProceduresOvarian CancerPostoperative CarePreoperative Care

Identifiers

PMID37451690
PMCPMC10423533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.