Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37451661›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2023

Micromechanical characterizations and viscoelastic modeling reveal elastic and viscoelastic heterogeneities in ovarian tissue and the significant viscoelastic contribution to the apparent elastic modulus determined by AFM indentation.

Samantha Stewart, Wenquan Ou, Helim Aranda-Espinoza, Shaik O Rahaman, Xiaoming He

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Molecular mechanisms of ovarian fibrosis.Molecular human reproduction · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samantha StewartFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Wenquan OuFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Helim Aranda-EspinozaFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Shaik O RahamanDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Xiaoming HeFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States. Electronic address: shawnhe@umd.edu.
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Investigate the mechanisms underlying microRNA-146a activity in regulation of foreign body response to biomaterialsR01AI172086 · NIAID · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Wenquan Ou, Shaik O Rahaman · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Microfluidic encapsulation of ovarian follicles for biomimetic 3D culture andcryopreservationR01EB023632 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI HE, XIAOMING · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI172086NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian follicles develop in a highly regulated mechanical microenvironment and disruptions to the microenvironment may cause infertility. However, the viscoelastic properties of the ovarian tissue are not well studied. Here, we characterize both the elastic and viscoelastic properties of ovarian tissue from both reproductively older and younger domestic cats using atomic force microscopy (AFM) indentation and viscoelastic models of stress relaxation. Importantly, our analyses reveal the apparent elastic modulus obtained from the conventional AFM indentation measurement is significantly higher than the intrinsic elastic modulus and insignificantly different from the equivalent elastic modulus that is the summation of the intrinsic elastic modulus and the viscoelastic contribution to modulus at time 0. Interestingly, the ovarian cortex of both reproductive age groups has a higher apparent/intrinsic modulus than that of the medulla. Furthermore, two different kinetics of stress relaxation are identified with rate constants of ∼1 s and ∼20-40 s, respectively. Moreover, the rate constant of the slow kinetics is significantly different between the cortex and medulla in the reproductively older ovaries. Finally, these mechanical heterogeneities appear to follow the heterogeneous distribution of hyaluronic acid (HA) in the ovary. These findings may be invaluable to the development of biomimetic follicle culture for treating infertility. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This study investigates not only elastic but also the viscoelastic heterogeneity in both reproductively younger and older ovarian tissues for the first time. Further, by combining AFM indentation measurement and viscoelastic modeling, we show the apparent elastic modulus conventionally reported in the literature for AFM indentation measurement is the summation of the intrinsic elastic modulus and a significant viscoelastic contribution to the modulus at time 0. This is an important consideration for others who use this method to quantify biomaterial properties. In addition, the possible connection between the mechanical and compositional heterogeneities is explored. These findings may be invaluable for designing biomaterials to recapitulate the mechanical environment of the ovary and possibly many other organs for biomimetic tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Elastic ModulusAnimalsCatsFemaleMicroscopy, Atomic ForceCollagenFollicleHyaluronic acidStress relaxationViscoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID37451661
PMCPMC10529990
OpenAlexW4384129386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.