Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37451553›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2023

Lessons learned from statewide contingency management rollouts addressing stimulant use in the Northwestern United States.

Sara C Parent, K Michelle Peavy, Diana Tyutyunnyk, Katherine A Hirchak, Tammera Nauts, Amy Dura, Lora Weed, Linda Barker, Michael G McDonell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sara C ParentDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; Promoting Research Initiatives in Substance Use and Mental Health Collaborative, Spokane, WA, USA. Electronic address: sara.parent@wsu.edu.
K Michelle PeavyDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; Promoting Research Initiatives in Substance Use and Mental Health Collaborative, Spokane, WA, USA.
Diana TyutyunnykDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; Promoting Research Initiatives in Substance Use and Mental Health Collaborative, Spokane, WA, USA.
Katherine A HirchakDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; Promoting Research Initiatives in Substance Use and Mental Health Collaborative, Spokane, WA, USA.
Tammera NautsMontana Primary Care Association, Helena, MT, United States of America.
Amy DuraWashington State Health Care Authority, Olympia, WA, United States of America.
Lora WeedWashington State Health Care Authority, Olympia, WA, United States of America.
Linda BarkerWashington State Health Care Authority, Olympia, WA, United States of America.
Michael G McDonellDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; Promoting Research Initiatives in Substance Use and Mental Health Collaborative, Spokane, WA, USA.

Funding

Culturally Re-Centering Contingency Management and Behavioral Economics to Increase Engagement with American Indian Young AdultsK01AA028831 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HIRCHAK, KATHERINE · 2020 to 2024
$889k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA028831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increases in stimulant drug use (such as methamphetamine) and related deaths creates an imperative for community settings to adopt evidence-based practices to help people who use stimulants. Contingency management (CM) is a behavioral intervention with decades of research demonstrating efficacy for the treatment of stimulant use disorder, but real-world adoption has been slow, due to well-known implementation barriers, including difficulty funding reinforcers, and stigma. This paper describes the training and technical assistance (TTA) efforts and lessons learned for two state-wide stimulant-focused CM implementation projects in the Northwestern United States (Montana and Washington). A total of 154 providers from 35 community-based service sites received didactic training in CM beginning in 2021. Seventeen of these sites, ten of eleven in Montana (90.9%) and seven of 24 in Washington (29.2%), went on to implement contingency management programs adherent to their state's established CM protocol and received ongoing TTA in the form of implementation coaching calls. These findings illustrate that site-specific barriers such as logistical fit precluded implementation in more than 50% of the trained sites; however, strategies for site-specific tailoring within the required protocol aided implementation, resulting in successful CM program launch in a diverse cross-section of service sites across the states. The lessons learned add to the body of literature describing CM implementation barriers and solutions.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System StimulantsMethamphetamineSubstance-Related DisordersBehavior TherapyHumansUnited StatesWashingtonCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethamphetamineCoachingContingency managementImplementationStimulant useSubstance use disorderTraining

Identifiers

PMID37451553
PMCPMC10787039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.