ArticleChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)2023
Randomized Controlled Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Africa: A Systematic Review.
Article in Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rising burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in African countries is attributed to the growing and aging of the populations, lifestyles, and environmental changes. This systematic review aims to map the available evidence on COPD interventions in Africa. Methods: We performed a systematic search in 6 databases (including local African databases) and registries with updates through January 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included patients diagnosed with COPD and were conducted in Africa, studying outcomes on acute respiratory episodes and rates, physical and functional abilities, and adverse events. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We primarily summarized the results in narrative form. Results: Out of 1594 identified publications, we included 18 studies with a total of 1504 participants, conducted in Egypt, South Africa, and Tunisia. Eight studies investigated interventions for patients in stable phases treated in outpatient settings, and 10 included patients with acute COPD exacerbations treated in emergency or intensive care settings. The interventions mainly included ventilatory support and pharmacological and rehabilitative interventions. Reported treatment effects were heterogeneous, ranging from no beneficial effects to clinically relevant benefits. Conclusions: The included studies were conducted in countries with high infrastructural development and half of them were set in intensive care units. Despite the paucity of RCTs on COPD management, research activities have been increasing over the last several years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.