Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37450838›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2023

Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Cancer Mortality Beginning One Year after a Negative Fecal Occult Blood Test, among Screen-Eligible 76- to 85-Year-Olds.

Ronit R Dalmat, Rebecca A Ziebell, Aruna Kamineni, Amanda I Phipps, Noel S Weiss, Erica S Breslau, Andrea N Burnett-Hartman, Douglas A Corley, V Paul Doria-Rose, Beverly B Green and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ronit R DalmatDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-6959-0817
Rebecca A ZiebellKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-4255-7785
Aruna KamineniKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-0763-989X
Amanda I PhippsDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-1446-2201
Noel S WeissDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-3987-5184
Erica S BreslauDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-6391-6305
Andrea N Burnett-HartmanKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Aurora, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0003-4009-0680
Douglas A CorleyDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.ORCID 0000-0001-6132-5165
V Paul Doria-RoseDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-8802-5143
Beverly B GreenKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0003-3040-3436
Ethan A HalmDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0003-3042-2741
Theodore R LevinDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0842-2377
Joanne E SchottingerKaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson School of Medicine, Department of Health Systems Science, Pasadena, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8276-7672
Jessica ChubakDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0003-1630-9021
Kaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of Washington · USNational Cancer Institute · USJohnson University · US

Funding

Optimizing Colorectal Cancer Screening PREcision and Outcomes in CommunIty-baSEd Populations (PRECISE)UM1CA222035 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CHUBAK, JESSICA, CORLEY, DOUGLAS ALLEN · 2018 to 2023
$15.6M
Developing Data-Driven Cancer ResearchersT32CA009168 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEPHEN M SCHWARTZ, MICHAEL Chiao-An WU · 1985 to 2026
$10.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009168NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA222035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer screening is universally recommended for adults ages 45 to 75 years. Noninvasive fecal occult blood tests are effective screening tests recommended by guidelines. However, empirical evidence to inform older adults' decisions about whether to continue screening is sparse, especially for individuals with prior screening.

methodsThis study used a retrospective cohort of older adults at three Kaiser Permanente integrated healthcare systems (Northern California, Southern California, Washington) and Parkland Health. Beginning 1 year following a negative stool-based screening test, cumulative risks of colorectal cancer incidence, colorectal cancer mortality (accounting for deaths from other causes), and non-colorectal cancer mortality were estimated.

resultsCumulative incidence of colorectal cancer in screen-eligible adults ages 76 to 85 with a negative fecal occult blood test 1 year ago (N = 118,269) was 0.23% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.20%-0.26%] after 2 years and 1.21% (95% CI, 1.13%-1.30%) after 8 years. Cumulative colorectal cancer mortality was 0.03% (95% CI, 0.02%-0.04%) after 2 years and 0.33% (95% CI, 0.28%-0.39%) after 8 years. Cumulative risk of death from non-colorectal cancer causes was 4.81% (95% CI, 4.68%-4.96%) after 2 years and 28.40% (95% CI, 27.95%-28.85%) after 8 years.

conclusionsAmong 76- to 85-year-olds with a recent negative stool-based test, cumulative colorectal cancer incidence and mortality estimates were low, especially within 2 years; death from other causes was over 100 times more likely than death from colorectal cancer. IMPACT: These findings of low absolute colorectal cancer risk, and comparatively higher risk of death from other causes, can inform decision-making regarding whether and when to continue colorectal cancer screening beyond age 75 among screen-eligible adults.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsOccult BloodAgedColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37450838
PMCPMC10592334
OpenAlexW4384282286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.