ArticleAnnals of surgery2024
The Brescia Internationally Validated European Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (EGUMIPS).
Article in Annals of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy across the learning curve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a bibliometric analysis of research trends and a meta-analysis on the association with intra pancreatic fat deposition.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Prophylactic abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic hepaticojejunostomy training in novices using robotic simulation and dry-lab suturing (ROSIM): randomized controlled crossover trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Trial
- Learning curve of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a CUSUM and risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis of 120 consecutive cases.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy after completion of the learning curve: a propensity score-matched and CUSUM analyses of perioperative outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Observational
- Conversion to open surgery during robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in surgical high-risk groups: patterns, risk factors, and outcomes in elderly and/or obese patients.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Observational
- Complete Segmental Parenchymal Vascular Occlusion for Robotic Enucleation of Distal Pancreatic Tumors (with video).Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic surgery in the 21st century: triumphs, turning points, and unresolved challenges.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- The era of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: is the robot ready to replace laparoscopy for extended left pancreatectomy?Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- Cost-analysis of Implementing Robot-assisted Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- Challenges and catalysators in building a robotic HPB program: the experience of a tertiary cancer center.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a structured narrative review of learning curve, patient selection, and program readiness.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Safety and oncologic efficacy of robotic surgery compared to open surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Surgical Outcomes of Sequential Robot-Assisted Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery in a Single Operating Room: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of a High-Volume Center in Japan (TAKUMI-6).Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Textbook outcomes in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a European multicenter analysis on surgical performance and success predictors.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Competency, Proficiency, and Mastery: Learning Curves for Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy at 16 International Expert Centers.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- External Validation of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery Complexity Grading System for Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Insights From the IGOMIPS Registry.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- The Italian Stance on Robotic Surgery: A Paradigm Shift in Health Technology Assessment Governance.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
83 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and update evidence-based and consensus-based guidelines on laparoscopic and robotic pancreatic surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS), including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, is complex and technically demanding. Minimizing the risk for patients requires stringent, evidence-based guidelines. Since the International Miami Guidelines on MIPS in 2019, new developments and key publications have been reported, necessitating an update.
methodsEvidence-based guidelines on 22 topics in 8 domains were proposed: terminology, indications, patients, procedures, surgical techniques and instrumentation, assessment tools, implementation and training, and artificial intelligence. The Brescia Internationally Validated European Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (EGUMIPS, September 2022) used the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology to assess the evidence and develop guideline recommendations, the Delphi method to establish consensus on the recommendations among the Expert Committee, and the AGREE II-GRS tool for guideline quality assessment and external validation by a Validation Committee.
resultsOverall, 27 European experts, 6 international experts, 22 international Validation Committee members, 11 Jury Committee members, 18 Research Committee members, and 121 registered attendees of the 2-day meeting were involved in the development and validation of the guidelines. In total, 98 recommendations were developed, including 33 on laparoscopic, 34 on robotic, and 31 on general MIPS, covering 22 topics in 8 domains. Out of 98 recommendations, 97 reached at least 80% consensus among the experts and congress attendees, and all recommendations were externally validated by the Validation Committee.
conclusionsThe EGUMIPS evidence-based guidelines on laparoscopic and robotic MIPS can be applied in current clinical practice to provide guidance to patients, surgeons, policy-makers, and medical societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.