ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
RNA covariation at helix-level resolution for the identification of evolutionarily conserved RNA structure.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of conserved RNA regulatory switches in living cells using RNA secondary structure ensemble mapping and covariation analysis.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Could Metabolism-Related Long Non-Coding RNAs Be More Conserved than Their Brain-Related Counterparts?Genes · 2026Review
- Article
- All-at-once RNA folding with 3D motif prediction framed by evolutionary information.Nature methods · 2025Article
- ECSFinder: optimized prediction of evolutionarily conserved RNA secondary structures from genome sequences.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- The Druggable Transcriptome Project: From Chemical Probes to Precision Medicines.Biochemistry · 2025Review
- Prediction of Circular RNA Secondary Structures and Their Targets.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Deep Conservation and Unexpected Evolutionary History of Neighboring lncRNAs MALAT1 and NEAT1.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Article
- Exploring the landscape of tools and resources for the analysis of long non-coding RNAs.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Many biologically important RNAs fold into specific 3D structures conserved through evolution. Knowing when an RNA sequence includes a conserved RNA structure that could lead to new biology is not trivial and depends on clues left behind by conservation in the form of covariation and variation. For that purpose, the R-scape statistical test was created to identify from alignments of RNA sequences, the base pairs that significantly covary above phylogenetic expectation. R-scape treats base pairs as independent units. However, RNA base pairs do not occur in isolation. The Watson-Crick (WC) base pairs stack together forming helices that constitute the scaffold that facilitates the formation of the non-WC base pairs, and ultimately the complete 3D structure. The helix-forming WC base pairs carry most of the covariation signal in an RNA structure. Here, I introduce a new measure of statistically significant covariation at helix-level by aggregation of the covariation significance and covariation power calculated at base-pair-level resolution. Performance benchmarks show that helix-level aggregated covariation increases sensitivity in the detection of evolutionarily conserved RNA structure without sacrificing specificity. This additional helix-level sensitivity reveals an artifact that results from using covariation to build an alignment for a hypothetical structure and then testing the alignment for whether its covariation significantly supports the structure. Helix-level reanalysis of the evolutionary evidence for a selection of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) reinforces the evidence against these lncRNAs having a conserved secondary structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.